Evaluation of a clinical decision support algorithm for patient-specific childhood immunization

被引:10
|
作者
Zhu, Vivienne J. [1 ,2 ]
Grannis, Shaun J. [1 ,2 ]
Tu, Wanzhu [1 ,2 ]
Rosenman, Marc B. [1 ,2 ]
Downs, Stephen M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Regenstrief Inst Inc, Indianapolis, IN USA
[2] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Childrens Hlth Res Serv, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
Clinical decision support system; Electronic medical record; Childhood immunization; GUIDELINE KNOWLEDGE MAINTENANCE; REMINDER/RECALL INTERVENTIONS; UNITED-STATES; CARE; GENERATION; RATES; TOOLS; LOGIC;
D O I
10.1016/j.artmed.2012.04.004
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) implementing standard childhood immunization guidelines, using real-world patient data from the Regenstrief Medical Record System (RMRS). Methods: Study subjects were age 6-years or younger in 2008 and had visited the pediatric clinic on the campus of Wishard Memorial Hospital. Immunization records were retrieved from the RMRS for 135 randomly selected pediatric patients. We compared vaccine recommendations from the CDSS for both eligible and recommended timelines, based on the child's date of birth and vaccine history, to recommendations from registered nurses who routinely selected vaccines for administration in a busy inner city hospital, using the same date of birth and vaccine history. Aggregated and stratified agreement and Kappa statistics were reported. The reasons for disagreement between suggestions from the CDSS and nurses were also identified. Results: For the 135 children, a total of 1215 vaccination suggestions were generated by nurses and were compared to the recommendations of the CDSS. The overall agreement rates were 81.3% and 90.6% for the eligible and recommended timelines, respectively. The overall Kappa values were 0.63 for the eligible timeline and 0.80 for the recommended timeline. Common reasons for disagreement between the CDSS and nurses were: (1) missed vaccination opportunities by nurses, (2) nurses sometimes suggested a vaccination before the minimal age and minimal waiting interval, (3) nurses usually did not validate patient immunization history, and (4) nurses sometimes gave an extra vaccine dose. Conclusion: Our childhood immunization CDSS can assist providers in delivering accurate childhood vaccinations. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 57
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical Decision Support Systems for Patient Safety A Focus Group Needs Assessment With Korean ICU Nurses
    Choi, Mona
    Choi, Ran
    Bae, Young-Ran
    Lee, Sun-Mi
    CIN-COMPUTERS INFORMATICS NURSING, 2011, 29 (11) : 671 - 678
  • [22] Patient-specific factors associated with use of diabetes self-management education and support programs in Louisiana
    Yoshida, Yilin
    Hong, Dongzhe
    Nauman, Elizabeth
    Price-Haywood, Eboni G.
    Bazzano, Alessandra N.
    Stoecker, Charles
    Hu, Gang
    Shen, Yun
    Katzmarzyk, Peter T.
    Fonseca, Vivian A.
    Shi, Lizheng
    BMJ OPEN DIABETES RESEARCH & CARE, 2021, 9 (SUPPL_1)
  • [23] Designing and validating a clinical decision support algorithm for diabetic nephroprotection in older patients
    Alsalemi, Noor
    Sadowski, Cheryl
    Elftouh, Naoual
    Kilpatrick, Kelley
    Houle, Sherylin
    Leclerc, Simon
    Fernandez, Nicolas
    Lafrance, Jean-Philippe
    BMJ HEALTH & CARE INFORMATICS, 2024, 31 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [24] Interprofessional Evaluation of a Medication Clinical Decision Support System Prior to Implementation
    Bauer, Jacqueline
    Busse, Marika
    Kopetzky, Tanja
    Seggewies, Christof
    Fromm, Martin F.
    Doerje, Frank
    APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 15 (03): : 637 - 649
  • [25] Evaluation of the use of clinical decision support and online resources for pharmacogenomics education
    Vitek, Carolyn R. Rohrer
    Nicholson, Wayne T.
    Schultz, Cloann
    Caraballo, Pedro J.
    PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2015, 16 (14) : 1595 - 1603
  • [26] Evaluation of a Clinical Decision Support System in the Domain of Chronic Wound Management
    Vogel, Stefan
    Richter, Jendrik
    Wache, Stefanie
    Pischek-Koch, Kerstin
    Auchter, Simone
    Zebbities, Sebastian
    Guettler, Karen
    Huebner, Ursula
    Pryzsucha, Mareike
    Huesers, Jens
    Sellemann, Bjoern
    PUBLIC HEALTH AND INFORMATICS, PROCEEDINGS OF MIE 2021, 2021, 281 : 535 - 539
  • [27] Preoperative Nomograms Predict Patient-Specific Cervical Spine Surgery Clinical and Quality of Life Outcomes
    Lubelski, Daniel
    Alentado, Vincent
    Nowacki, Amy S.
    Shriver, Michael
    Abdullah, Kalil G.
    Steinmetz, Michael P.
    Benzel, Edward C.
    Mroz, Thomas E.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 83 (01) : 104 - 113
  • [28] Improving Patient Matching: Single Patient view for Clinical Decision Support using Big Data Analytics
    Duggal, Reena
    Khatri, Sunil Kumar
    Shukla, Balvinder
    2015 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RELIABILITY, INFOCOM TECHNOLOGIES AND OPTIMIZATION (ICRITO) (TRENDS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS), 2015,
  • [29] An AI-based patient-specific clinical decision support system for OA patients choosing surgery or not: study protocol for a single-centre, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
    Nanna Kastrup
    Helene H. Bjerregaard
    Mogens Laursen
    Jan B. Valentin
    Søren P. Johnsen
    Cathrine E. Jensen
    Trials, 24
  • [30] Re-Aiming Equity Evaluation in Clinical Decision Support A Scoping Review of Equity Assessments in Surgical Decision Support Systems
    Ingraham, Nicholas E.
    Jones, Emma K.
    King, Samantha
    Dries, James
    Phillips, Michael
    Loftus, Tyler
    Evans, Heather L.
    Melton, Genevieve B.
    Tignanelli, Christopher J.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2023, 277 (03) : 359 - 364