Effects of Electrical Stimulation in Spastic Muscles After Stroke Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:77
作者
Stein, Cinara [1 ,2 ]
Fritsch, Carolina Gassen [1 ]
Robinson, Caroline [1 ]
Sbruzzi, Graciele [3 ]
Plentz, Rodrigo Della Mea [1 ]
机构
[1] UFCSPA, Phys Therapy Dept, BR-90050170 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] FUC, Inst Cardiol Rio Grande Sul IC, Lab Clin Invest, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Phys Therapy Undergrad, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
electric stimulation; muscle spasticity; review; stroke; TOXIN TYPE-A; BOTULINUM TOXIN; MOTOR RECOVERY; UPPER-EXTREMITY; UPPER-LIMB; REHABILITATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREVALENCE; PARESIS; FLEXORS;
D O I
10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009633
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose-Neuromuscular electric stimulation (NMES) has been used to reduce spasticity and improve range of motion in patients with stroke. However, contradictory results have been reported by clinical trials. A systematic review of randomized clinical trials was conducted to assess the effect of treatment with NMES with or without association to another therapy on spastic muscles after stroke compared with placebo or another intervention. Methods-We searched the following electronic databases (from inception to February 2015): Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Two independent reviewers assessed the eligibility of studies based on predefined inclusion criteria (application of electric stimulation on the lower or upper extremities, regardless of NMES dosage, and comparison with a control group which was not exposed to electric stimulation), excluding studies with <3 days of intervention. The primary outcome extracted was spasticity, assessed by the Modified Ashworth Scale, and the secondary outcome extracted was range of motion, assessed by Goniometer. Results-Of the total of 5066 titles, 29 randomized clinical trials were included with 940 subjects. NMES provided reductions in spasticity (-0.30 [95% confidence interval, -0.58 to -0.03], n=14 randomized clinical trials) and increase in range of motion when compared with control group (2.87 [95% confidence interval, 1.18-4.56], n=13 randomized clinical trials) after stroke. Conclusions-NMES combined with other intervention modalities can be considered as a treatment option that provides improvements in spasticity and range of motion in patients after stroke.
引用
收藏
页码:2197 / 2205
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] ALFIERI V, 1982, SCAND J REHABIL MED, V14, P177
  • [2] [Anonymous], NEURO REHABIL
  • [3] [Anonymous], REHABILITACION MADR
  • [4] [Anonymous], COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
  • [5] [Anonymous], TURK J PHYS MED REHA
  • [6] Does electrical stimulation reduce spasticity after stroke? A randomized controlled study
    Bakhtiary, Amir H.
    Fatemy, Elham
    [J]. CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2008, 22 (05) : 418 - 425
  • [7] Training of reaching in stroke survivors with severe and chronic upper limb paresis using a novel nonrobotic device - A randomized clinical trial
    Barker, Ruth N.
    Brauer, Sandra G.
    Carson, Richard G.
    [J]. STROKE, 2008, 39 (06) : 1800 - 1807
  • [8] Functional Electrical Stimulation-Assisted Active Cycling-Therapeutic Effects in Patients With Hemiparesis From 7 Days to 6 Months After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
    Bauer, Petra
    Krewer, Carmen
    Golaszewski, Stefan
    Koenig, Eberhard
    Mueller, Friedemann
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2015, 96 (02): : 188 - 196
  • [9] INTERRATER RELIABILITY OF A MODIFIED ASHWORTH SCALE OF MUSCLE SPASTICITY
    BOHANNON, RW
    SMITH, MB
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1987, 67 (02): : 206 - 207
  • [10] Comparison of the effectiveness of active and passive neuromuscular electrical stimulation of hemiplegic upper extremities: a randomized, controlled trial
    Boyaci, Ahmet
    Topuz, Oya
    Alkan, Hakan
    Ozgen, Merih
    Sarsan, Ayse
    Yildiz, Necmettin
    Ardic, Fusun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2013, 36 (04) : 315 - 322