Handling Uncertainty in Structural Equation Modeling

被引:1
|
作者
Romano, Rosaria [1 ]
Palumbo, Francesco [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calabria, Cosenza, Italy
[2] Univ Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
来源
SOFT METHODS FOR DATA SCIENCE | 2017年 / 456卷
关键词
Interval-valued data; Possibilistic regression; SEM; Extreme values; REGRESSION-ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-42972-4_53
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper attempts to propose an overview of a recent method named partial possibilistic regression path modeling (PPRPM), which is a particular structural equation model that combines the principles of path modeling with those of possibilistic regression to model the net of relations among variables. PPRPM assumes that the randomness can be referred to the measurement error, that is the error in modeling the relations among the observed variables, and the vagueness to the structural error, that is the uncertainty in modeling the relations among the latent variables behind each block. PPRPM gives rise to possibilistic regressions that account for the imprecise nature or vagueness in our understanding phenomena, which is manifested by yielding interval path coefficients of the structural model. However, possibilistic regression is known to be a model sensitive to extreme values. That is way recent developments of PPRPM are focused on robust procedures for the detection of extreme values to omit or lessen their effect on the modeling. A case study on the motivational and emotional aspects of teaching is used to illustrate the procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 438
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Causal Language in Structural Equation Modeling
    Sanchez-Iglesias, Ivan
    Aguayo-Estremera, Raimundo
    Miguel-Alvaro, Alejandro
    Paniagua, David
    REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE DIAGNOSTICO Y EVALUACION-E AVALIACAO PSICOLOGICA, 2022, 5 (66): : 35 - 51
  • [2] A Critique of the Structural Equation Modeling Technique
    Makina, Daniel
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES (ECRM2016), 2016, : 415 - 422
  • [3] Structural Equation Modeling with JMP® Pro
    Gonzales, Joseph E.
    MEASUREMENT-INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND PERSPECTIVES, 2021, 19 (01) : 80 - 92
  • [4] Review of strategies for handling geological uncertainty in groundwater flow and transport modeling
    Refsgaard, Jens Christian
    Christensen, Steen
    Sonnenborg, Torben O.
    Seifert, Dorte
    Hojberg, Anker Lajer
    Troldborg, Lars
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2012, 36 : 36 - 50
  • [5] STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING FOR SIMULATION MET AMODELING
    Mertens, Kai G.
    Lorscheid, Iris
    Meyer, Matthias
    2015 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2015, : 701 - 712
  • [6] Modeling Model Misspecification in Structural Equation Models
    Robitzsch, Alexander
    STATS, 2023, 6 (02): : 689 - 705
  • [7] SEM: Structural Equation Modeling in Molecular Biology
    Igolkina A.A.
    Samsonova M.G.
    Biophysics, 2018, 63 (2) : 139 - 148
  • [8] Education: a comparative structural equation modeling study
    Camgoz-Akdag, Hatice
    Zaim, Selim
    CYPRUS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH (CY-ICER-2012), 2012, 47 : 874 - 880
  • [9] Structural equation modeling of adolescents' life satisfaction
    Kozeny, J.
    Csemy, L.
    Tisanska, L.
    CESKOSLOVENSKA PSYCHOLOGIE, 2007, 51 (03): : 224 - 237
  • [10] Understanding Robust Corrections in Structural Equation Modeling
    Savalei, Victoria
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2014, 21 (01) : 149 - 160