Utility of the "Surprise" question to identify dialysis patients with high mortality

被引:242
作者
Moss, Alvin H. [1 ,2 ]
Ganjoo, Jesse
Sharma, Sanjay
Gansor, Julie
Senft, Sharon
Weaner, Barbara
Dalton, Cheryl.
MacKay, Karen
Pellegrino, Beth
Anantharaman, Priya
Schmidt, Rebecca
机构
[1] W Virginia Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Eth & Law, Dept Med,Sect Nephrol, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[2] W Virginia Univ, Robert C Byrd Hlth Sci Ctr, Ctr Hlth Eth & Law, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
来源
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY | 2008年 / 3卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.2215/CJN.00940208
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and objectives: Dialysis patients are increasingly characterized by older age, multiple comorbidities, and shortened life expectancy. This study investigated whether the "surprise" question, "Would I be surprised if this patient died in the next year?" identifies patients who are at high risk for early mortality. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: This prospective cohort study of 147 patients in three hemodialysis dialysis units classified patients into "yes" and "no" groups on the basis of the "surprise" question response and tracked patient status (alive or dead) at 12 mo. Demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and Karnofsky Performance Status score were measured. Results: Initially, 34 (23%) patients were classified in the "no" group. Compared with the 113 patients in the "yes" group, the patients in the "no" group were older (72.5 +/- 12.8 versus 64.5 +/- 14.9), had a higher comorbidity score (7.1 +/- 2.3 versus 5.8 +/- 2.1), and had a lower performance status score (69.7 +/- 17.1 versus 81.6 +/- 15.8). At 12 mo, 22 (15%) patients had died; the mortality rate for the "no" group was 29.4% and for the "yes" group was 10.6%. The odds of dying within I yr for the patients in the "no" group were 3.5 times higher than for patients in the "yes" group, (odds ratio 3.507, 95% CI 1.356 to 9.067, P = 0.01). Conclusions: The "surprise" question is effective in identifying sicker dialysis patients who have a high risk for early mortality and should receive priority for palliative care interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:1379 / 1384
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], SUPPORTIVE CARE RENA
  • [2] Efficacy of the world health organization analgesic ladder to treat pain in end-stage renal disease
    Barakzoy, Ahmad S.
    Moss, Alvin H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2006, 17 (11): : 3198 - 3203
  • [3] A simple comorbidity scale predicts clinical outcomes and costs in dialysis patients
    Beddhu, S
    Bruns, FJ
    Saul, M
    Seddon, P
    Zeidel, ML
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 108 (08) : 609 - 613
  • [4] Nephrology nurse practitioners in a collaborative care model
    Bolton, WK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1998, 31 (05) : 786 - 793
  • [5] Chang VT, 2000, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V88, P1175, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000301)88:5<1175::AID-CNCR30>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-N
  • [7] Chochinov HM, 1997, AM J PSYCHIAT, V154, P674
  • [8] The family perspective of ESRD deaths
    Cohen, LM
    Germain, MJ
    Woods, AL
    Mirot, A
    Burleson, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2005, 45 (01) : 154 - 161
  • [9] Dialysis discontinuation and palliative care
    Cohen, LM
    Germain, M
    Poppel, DM
    Woods, A
    Kjellstrand, CM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2000, 36 (01) : 140 - 144
  • [10] Pain in hemodialysis patients: Prevalence, cause, severity, and management
    Davison, SN
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2003, 42 (06) : 1239 - 1247