An Investigation of Justice in supply chain relationships and their performance impact

被引:113
作者
Narasimhan, Ram [1 ]
Narayanan, Sriram [1 ]
Srinivasan, Ravi [2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Eli Broad Grad Sch Management, Dept Supply Chain Management, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Loyola Univ Maryland, Sellinger Sch Business & Management, Dept Informat Syst & Operat Management, Baltimore, MD 21202 USA
关键词
Buyer-supplier relationships; Inter-organizational justice; Survey research; ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL-EXCHANGE; INTERACTIONAL JUSTICE; PERCEIVED FAIRNESS; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; DARK SIDE; MANAGEMENT; NONRESPONSE; INTEGRATION; ROLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jom.2013.05.001
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Justice is important in improving performance of supply chain relationships. However, the role of justice in improving performance in supply chain relationships is an under-investigated subject in the literature. In studying the joint impact of justice dimensions, the traditional assumption is that the three forms of justice interact with each other in a multiplicative manner. However, this assumption creates a managerial problem as discussed in this paper. We outline a different view of how the justice dimensions interact with one another utilizing the constraining factor model (CFM). We show that the CFM resolves some of the problems arising from the choice of multiplicative interaction of justice measures on performance. Specifically, we demonstrate that an increase in procedural, distributive or interactional justice results in a significant and positive improvement in performance only if the specific justice dimension is the constraining factor in the relationship. Overall, our analysis suggests that all three dimensions are important and a high level of one of the justice elements will not compensate for a low level of another, a view that is put forward by a number of past research studies injustice. We discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of our findings. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 247
页数:12
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Anderson E, 2005, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V46, P75
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, INTERNET MAIL MIXED
[3]   On making causal claims: A review and recommendations [J].
Antonakis, John ;
Bendahan, Samuel ;
Jacquart, Philippe ;
Lalive, Rafael .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2010, 21 (06) :1086-1120
[4]   THE ROLE OF FAIRNESS IN ALLIANCE FORMATION [J].
Arino, Africa ;
Ring, Peter Smith .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (10) :1054-1087
[5]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[6]   ASSESSING CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH [J].
BAGOZZI, RP ;
LI, YJ ;
PHILLIPS, LW .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1991, 36 (03) :421-458
[7]  
Bies R. J., 2001, INT INJUSTICE SACRED
[8]   Nonresponse and generalizability in academic research [J].
Blair, E ;
Zinkhan, GM .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2006, 34 (01) :4-7
[9]   The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on postcomplaint behavior [J].
Blodgett, JG ;
Hill, DJ ;
Tax, SS .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 1997, 73 (02) :185-210
[10]   STAKEHOLDERS, RECIPROCITY, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE [J].
Bosse, Douglas A. ;
Phillips, Robert A. ;
Harrison, Jeffrey S. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2009, 30 (04) :447-456