Hydrologic calibration and validation of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool for the Leon River watershed

被引:20
作者
不详
机构
[1] Grassland Soil and Water Research Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Temple, TX
[2] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Temple, TX
[3] USDA ARS, El Reno, OK
[4] Grassland Soil and Water Research Laboratory, USDA ARS
关键词
Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP); hydrologic modeling; Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT); watershed modeling;
D O I
10.2489/jswc.63.6.533
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The Leon River watershed which drains into Lake Belton, a primary drinking water supply for central Texas residents, is being affected by high-density daily production and manure management. Our objective was to apply the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model to evaluate its ability to simulate the hydrology of the Leon River watershed including water discharge from treatment facilities, reservoirs, and point sources. The 2005 version of SWAT (SWAT2005) was calibrated and verified using hydrologic data from the watershed. Runoff was simulated well (0.65 E(NS) <= 0.75 vertical bar good vertical bar) to very well (E(NS) > 0.75 vertical bar very good vertical bar) based on the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (E(NS)) value. Average streamflow simulations agreed well with observed values during the calibration phase (PBIAS < +/- 10 vertical bar very good vertical bar). but the validation period agreement (PBIAS >= +/-25 vertical bar unsatisfactory vertical bar) was less than desired because one of the five validates stream gauges fell into the unsatisfactory range. These results demonstrate the rigor needed to calibrate and validate simulation models for the Conservation Effects Assessment Project, and although additional studies are needed, they also confirm that SWAT2005 can be an effective tool for evaluating the hydrology within the Leon River watershed.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 541
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Arnold J.G., Spatial Scale Variability in Model Development and Parameterization, (1992)
[2]  
Arnold J.G., Allen P.M., Estimating hydro- logic budgets for three Illinois watersheds, Journal of Hydrology, 176, 1-4, pp. 57-77, (1996)
[3]  
Arnold J.G., Allen P.M., Bernhardt G., A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model, Journal of Hydrology, 142, 1-4, pp. 47-69, (1993)
[4]  
Arnold J.G., Allen P.M., Muttiah R.S., Bernhardt G., Automated base flow separation and recession analysis techniques, Groundwater, 33, 6, pp. 1010-1018, (1995)
[5]  
Arnold J.G., Fohrer N., SWAT2000: Current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modeling, Hydrologic Processes, 19, 3, pp. 563-572, (2005)
[6]  
Arnold J.G., Sriruvasan R., Muttiah R.S., Williams J.R., Large-area hydrologic modeling and assessment: Part I. Model development, Journal of American Water Resources Association, 34, 1, pp. 73-89, (1998)
[7]  
Arnold J.G., Srinivasan R., Muttiah R.S., Large-scale hydrologic modeling and assessment Effects of Human-Induced Changes on Hydrologic Systems, AWRA Annual Summer Symp., pp. 1-16, (1994)
[8]  
Arnold J.G., Srinivasan R., Ramanarayanan T.S., Diluzio M., Water resources of the Texas gulf basin, Water Science and Technology, 39, 3, pp. 121-133, (1999)
[9]  
Arnold J.G., Williams J.R., Nicks A.D., Simmons N.B., SWRRB:A Basin Scale Simulation Model for Soil and Water Resources Management, (1990)
[10]  
Barlund I., Kirkkala T., Malve O., Kamari J., Assessing the SWAT model performance in the evaluation of management actions for the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in a Finnish catchment, Environmental Modeling and Software, 22, 5, pp. 719-724, (2007)