Economic Analysis of Infectious Disease Consultation for Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Among Hospitalized Patients

被引:5
作者
Pliakos, Elina Eleftheria [1 ,2 ]
Ziakas, Panayiotis D. [1 ]
Mylonakis, Eleftherios [1 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Rhode Isl Hosp, Infect Dis Div, Warren Alpert Med Sch, 593 Eddy St,POB 3rd Floor,Ste 328-330, Providence, RI 02903 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Div Gen Internal Med, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
BLOOD-STREAM INFECTIONS; QUALITY-OF-CARE; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; METHICILLIN-RESISTANT; IMPACT; MANAGEMENT; MORTALITY; INTERVENTION; MULTICENTER; SPECIALISTS;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.34186
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia is associated with a significant burden of mortality, morbidity, and health care costs. Infectious disease consultation may be associated with reduced mortality and bacteremia recurrence rates. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of infectious disease consultation for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this economic evaluation, a decision-analytic model was constructed comparing infectious disease consult with no consult. The population was adult hospital inpatients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia diagnosed with at least 1 positive blood culture. Cost-effectiveness was calculated as deaths averted and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Uncertainty was addressed by plotting cost-effectiveness planes and acceptability curves for various willingness-to-pay thresholds. Costs and outcomes were calculated for a time horizon of 6 months. The analysis was performed from a societal perspective and included studies that had been published by January 2022. INTERVENTIONS Patients received or did not receive formal bedside consultation after positive blood cultures for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcomes were incremental difference in effectiveness (survival probabilities), incremental difference in cost (US dollars) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (US dollars/deaths averted). RESULTS This model included 1708 patients who received consultation and 1273 patients who did not. In the base-case analysis, the cost associated with the infectious disease consult strategy was $54 137.4 and the associated probability of survival was 0.77. For the no consult strategy, the cost was $57 051.2, and the probability of survival was 0.72. The incremental difference in cost between strategies was $2913.8, and the incremental difference in effectiveness was 0.05. Overall, consultation was associated with estimated savings of $55 613.4/death averted (incremental cost effectiveness ratio, -$55613.4/death averted). In the probabilistic analysis, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000, infectious disease consult was cost-effective compared with no consult in 54% of 10 000 simulations. In cost-effectiveness acceptability curves, the consult strategy was cost effective in 58% to 73%) of simulations compared with no consult for a willingness-to-pay threshold ranging from $0 to $150 000. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that infectious disease consultation may be a cost-effective strategy for management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and that it is associated with health care cost-savings.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], HOSP ADJUSTED EXPENS
  • [2] Impact of Infectious Disease Consultation on Quality of Care, Mortality, and Length of Stay in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Results From a Large Multicenter Cohort Study
    Bai, Anthony D.
    Showler, Adrienne
    Burry, Lisa
    Steinberg, Marilyn
    Ricciuto, Daniel R.
    Fernandes, Tania
    Chiu, Anna
    Raybardhan, Sumit
    Science, Michelle
    Fernando, Eshan
    Tomlinson, George
    Bell, Chaim M.
    Morris, Andrew M.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2015, 60 (10) : 1451 - 1461
  • [3] Briggs A., 2006, DECISION MODELLING H
  • [4] Impact of daily versus weekly service of infectious diseases consultation on hospital antimicrobial consumption: a retrospective study
    Cona, Andrea
    Gazzola, Lidia
    Vigano, Ottavia
    Bini, Teresa
    Marchetti, Giulia Carla
    d'Arminio Monforte, Antonella
    [J]. BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [5] Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: An update
    DerSimonian, Rebecca
    Kacker, Raghu
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2007, 28 (02) : 105 - 114
  • [6] Doubilet P, 1985, Med Decis Making, V5, P157, DOI 10.1177/0272989X8500500205
  • [7] Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves - facts, fallacies and frequently asked questions
    Fenwick, E
    O'Brien, BJ
    Briggs, A
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2004, 13 (05) : 405 - 415
  • [8] A guide to cost-effectiveness acceptability curves
    Fenwick, E
    Byford, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 187 : 106 - 108
  • [9] Telephone Consultation Cannot Replace Bedside Infectious Disease Consultation in the Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
    Forsblom, E.
    Ruotsalainen, E.
    Ollgren, J.
    Jarvinen, A.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 56 (04) : 527 - 535
  • [10] Outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia according to compliance with recommendations of infectious diseases specialists:: Experience with 244 patients
    Fowler, VG
    Sanders, LL
    Sexton, DJ
    Kong, LK
    Marr, KA
    Gopal, AK
    Gottlieb, G
    McClelland, RS
    Corey, GR
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1998, 27 (03) : 478 - 486