Pharmacology of botulinum toxin: differences between type A preparations

被引:136
作者
Rosales, RL
Bigalke, H
Dressler, D
机构
[1] Univ Santo Tomas, Dept Neurol & Psychiat, Res Ctr Hlth Sci, Manila, Philippines
[2] St Lukes Med Ctr, Ctr Movement Disorders, Manila, Philippines
[3] Hannover Med Sch, Inst Toxicol, D-3000 Hannover, Germany
[4] Univ Rostock, Dept Neurol, Rostock, Germany
关键词
botulinum toxin type A; diffusion; digit abduction test; pharmacology; single-fiber electromyography;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01438.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Different types of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) block different proteins of the soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) protein complex within cholinergic nerve terminals, producing blockade of cholinergic neuromuscular and autonomic synapses. Animal studies indicate the longest duration of action for BoNT type A (BoNTA) followed by types B, F, and E. Diffusion to adjacent and remote muscles may be related to protein composition, dilutions, volume, target muscle selection, and injection technique. A review of head-to-head, randomized, controlled trials of BoNTA preparations (Botox (R) and Dysport (R)) suggests that Dysport (R) tends to have higher efficacy, longer duration, and higher frequency of adverse effects. Conversion factors between the preparations varied, however, and remain controversial. In clinical settings, a Botox (R):Dysport (R) conversion ratio of 1:3 may be appropriate. Animal studies suggest a conversion ratio of 1:2.5-3. When therapeutic effects between these preparations are attempting to be equalized, Dysport (R) seems to produce more adverse effects. In mice, Botox (R) appears to have a better safety margin than Dysport (R) and BoNTB. In rats, diffusion margins are similar for Botox (R) and Dysport (R). Jitter derived from stimulation single-fiber EMG of injected and remote muscles show no differences between Botox (R) and Dysport (R). Atrophy of extrafusal muscle fibers of injected and remote muscles do not differ between the BoNTA preparations.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 10
页数:9
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
AMPIL E, 2003, PHILIPPINE J NEUROLO, V7, P25
[2]   Muscle fiber atrophy in leg muscles after botulinum toxin type A treatment of cervical dystonia [J].
Ansved, T ;
Odergren, T ;
Borg, K .
NEUROLOGY, 1997, 48 (05) :1440-1442
[3]   Botulinum neurotoxin serotypes A and B preparations have different safety margins in preclinical models of muscle weakening efficacy and systemic safety [J].
Aoki, KR .
TOXICON, 2002, 40 (07) :923-928
[4]   Preclinical update on BOTOX® (botulinum toxin type A)-purified neurotoxin complex relative to other botulinum neurotoxin preparations [J].
Aoki, KR .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 1999, 6 :S3-S10
[5]   A comparison of the safety margins of botulinum neurotoxin serotypes A, B, and F in mice [J].
Aoki, KR .
TOXICON, 2001, 39 (12) :1815-1820
[6]  
AREZZO JC, 2002, SCI THERAPEUTIC ASPE, P123
[7]   SECRETS OF SECRETION REVEALED [J].
BARINAGA, M .
SCIENCE, 1993, 260 (5107) :487-489
[8]  
Barnes, 1995, MOVEMENT DISORD, V10, P56
[9]  
Berardelli A, 2002, SCI THERAPEUTIC ASPE, P171
[10]   Comparison of neuromuscular blockade and recovery with botulinum toxins A and F [J].
Billante, CR ;
Zealear, DL ;
Billante, M ;
Reyes, JH ;
Sant'Anna, G ;
Rodriguez, R ;
Stone, RE .
MUSCLE & NERVE, 2002, 26 (03) :395-403