On the Nature of Semantic Constraints on Lexical Access

被引:10
作者
Weber, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Crocker, Matthew W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, NL-6525 XD Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Saarland, D-6600 Saarbrucken, Germany
关键词
Spoken-word recognition; Semantic constraints; Eye-tracking; German; SPOKEN-WORD RECOGNITION; AMBIGUOUS WORDS; EYE-MOVEMENTS; NEIGHBORHOOD ACTIVATION; LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION; SPEECH-PERCEPTION; TIME-COURSE; SENTENCE COMPREHENSION; PROCESSING TIME; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1007/s10936-011-9184-0
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
We present two eye-tracking experiments that investigate lexical frequency and semantic context constraints in spoken-word recognition in German. In both experiments, the pivotal words were pairs of nouns overlapping at onset but varying in lexical frequency. In Experiment 1, German listeners showed an expected frequency bias towards high-frequency competitors (e.g., , 'flower') when instructed to click on low-frequency targets (e.g., , 'blouse'). In Experiment 2, semantically constraining context increased the availability of appropriate low-frequency target words prior to word onset, but did not influence the availability of semantically inappropriate high-frequency competitors at the same time. Immediately after target word onset, however, the activation of high-frequency competitors was reduced in semantically constraining sentences, but still exceeded that of unrelated distractor words significantly. The results suggest that (1) semantic context acts to downgrade activation of inappropriate competitors rather than to exclude them from competition, and (2) semantic context influences spoken-word recognition, over and above anticipation of upcoming referents.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 214
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Syllabic Effects in Italian Lexical Access
    Lara Tagliapietra
    R. Fanari
    S. Collina
    P. Tabossi
    Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2009, 38 : 511 - 526
  • [32] Speaker information affects false recognition of unstudied lexical-semantic associates
    Luthra, Sahil
    Fox, Neal P.
    Blumstein, Sheila E.
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2018, 80 (04) : 894 - 912
  • [33] The contribution of audiovisual speech to lexical-semantic processing in natural spoken sentences
    Brunelliere, Angele
    Delrue, Laurence
    Auran, Cyril
    LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, : 694 - 711
  • [34] Phonemic feature involvement in lexical access in grades 3 and 5: Evidence from visual and auditory lexical decision tasks
    Sauval, Karinne
    Perre, Laetitia
    Casalis, Severine
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2018, 182 : 212 - 219
  • [35] The interplay between respectfulness and lexical-semantic in reading Chinese: evidence from ERPs
    Ji, Liyan
    Cai, Lin
    COGNITIVE NEURODYNAMICS, 2022, 16 (01) : 101 - 115
  • [36] Inhibition of lexical representations after violated semantic predictions
    Kim, Jina
    Wessel, Jan R.
    Hendrickson, Kristi
    COGNITION, 2023, 240
  • [37] Semantic Richness Effects in Spoken Word Recognition: A Lexical Decision and Semantic Categorization Megastudy
    Goh, Winston D.
    Yap, Melvin J.
    Lau, Mabel C.
    Ng, Melvin M. R.
    Tan, Luuan-Chin
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [38] Lexical access in American Sign Language: An ERP investigation of effects of semantics and phonology
    Gutierrez, Eva
    Williams, Deborah
    Grosvald, Michael
    Corina, David
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2012, 1468 : 63 - 83
  • [39] Is speech recognition automatic? Lexical competition, but not initial lexical access, requires cognitive resources
    Zhang, Xujin
    Samuel, Arthur G.
    MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH, 2018, 775 : 32 - 50
  • [40] Language selective or non-selective in bilingual lexical access? It depends on lexical tones!
    Wang, Xin
    Hui, Bronson
    Chen, Siyu
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (03):