Improving the prediction of the trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters using dental cone-beam computed tomography

被引:14
作者
He, Rong-Ting [1 ]
Tu, Ming-Gene [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Heng-Li [1 ,3 ]
Tsai, Ming-Tzu [4 ]
Wu, Jay [5 ]
Hsu, Jui-Ting [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Sch Dent, Coll Dent, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[2] China Med Univ & Hosp, Dept Dent, 91 Hsueh Shih Rd, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[3] Asia Univ, Dept Bioinformat & Med Engn, Taichung 413, Taiwan
[4] Hungkuang Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Taichung 433, Taiwan
[5] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Dept Biomed Imaging & Radiol Sci, Taipei 112, Taiwan
关键词
Dental cone-beam computed tomography; Micro-computed tomography; Trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters; Image preprocessing approach; IMPLANT SITES; MICROCOMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIFFERENT REGIONS; CANCELLOUS BONE; DENSITY; CT; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-019-0313-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn this study, we explored how various preprocessing approaches can be employed to enhance the capability of dental CBCT to accurately estimate trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters.MethodsIn total, 30 bovine vertebrae cancellous bone specimens were used for in study. Voxel resolution 18-m micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and 100-m dental CBCT were used to scan each specimen. Micro-CT images were used to calculate trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters; the results were set as the gold standard. Subsequently, before the dental CBCT images were converted into binary images to calculate trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters, three preprocessing approaches were used to process the dental CBCT images. For Group 1, no preprocessing approach was applied. For Group 2, images were sharpened and despeckable noises were removed. For Group 3, the function of local thresholding was added to Group 2 to form Group 3. For Group 4, the air pixels was removed from Group 3 to form Group 4. Subsequently, all images were imported into a software package to estimate trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters (bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (TbTh), trabecular number (TbN), and trabecular separation (TbSp)). Finally, a paired t-test and a Pearson correlation test were performed to compare the capability of micro-CT with the capability of dental CBCT for estimating trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters.ResultsRegardless of whether dental CBCT images underwent image preprocessing (Groups 1 to 4), the four trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters measured using dental CBCT images were significantly different from those measured using micro-CT images. However, after three image preprocessing approaches were applied to the dental CBCT images (Group 4), the BV/TV obtained using dental CBCT was highly positively correlated with that obtained using micro-CT (r = 0.87, p < 0.001); the correlation coefficient was greater than that of Group 1 (r = -0.15, p = 0.412), Group 2 (r = 0.16, p = 0.386), and Group 3 (r = 0.47, p = 0.006). After dental CBCT images underwent image preprocessing, the efficacy of using dental CBCT for estimating TbN and TbSp was enhanced.ConclusionsImage preprocessing approaches can be used to enhance the efficacy of using dental CBCT for predicting trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Implant Dentistry: The International Congress of Oral Implantologists Consensus Report [J].
Benavides, Erika ;
Rios, Hector F. ;
Ganz, Scott D. ;
An, Chang-Hyeon ;
Resnik, Randolph ;
Reardon, Gayle Tieszen ;
Feldman, Steven J. ;
Mah, James K. ;
Hatcher, David ;
Kim, Myung-Jin ;
Sohn, Dong-Seok ;
Palti, Ady ;
Perel, Morton L. ;
Judy, Kenneth W. M. ;
Misch, Carl E. ;
Wang, Hom-Lay .
IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2012, 21 (02) :78-86
[2]   Novel digital imaging techniques to assess the outcome in oral rehabilitation with dental implants: a narrative review [J].
Benic, Goran I. ;
Elmasry, Moustafa ;
Haemmerle, Christoph H. F. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 :86-96
[3]   Guidelines for Assessment of Bone Microstructure in Rodents Using Micro-Computed Tomography [J].
Bouxsein, Mary L. ;
Boyd, Stephen K. ;
Christiansen, Blaine A. ;
Guldberg, Robert E. ;
Jepsen, Karl J. ;
Mueller, Ralph .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2010, 25 (07) :1468-1486
[4]   High-resolution computed tomography for architectural characterization of human lumbar cancellous bone: Relationships with histomorphometry and biomechanics [J].
Cendre, E ;
Mitton, D ;
Roux, JP ;
Arlot, ME ;
Duboeuf, F ;
Burt-Pichat, B ;
Rumelhart, C ;
Peix, G ;
Meunier, PJ .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 10 (05) :353-360
[5]   Optimization of cone beam CT exposure for pre-surgical evaluation of the implant site [J].
Dawood, A. ;
Brown, J. ;
Sauret-Jackson, V. ;
Purkayastha, S. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 41 (01) :70-74
[6]   Bone augmentation followed by implant surgery in the edentulous mandible: A systematic review [J].
de Groot, R. J. ;
Oomens, M. A. E. M. ;
Forouzanfar, T. ;
Schulten, E. A. J. M. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2018, 45 (04) :334-343
[7]   Methods for Assessing Bone Quality: A Review [J].
Donnelly, Eve .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (08) :2128-2138
[8]   BoneJ Free and extensible bone image analysis in ImageJ [J].
Doube, Michael ;
Klosowski, Michal M. ;
Arganda-Carreras, Ignacio ;
Cordelieres, Fabrice P. ;
Dougherty, Robert P. ;
Jackson, Jonathan S. ;
Schmid, Benjamin ;
Hutchinson, John R. ;
Shefelbine, Sandra J. .
BONE, 2010, 47 (06) :1076-1079
[9]   Do periapical and periodontal pathologies affect Schneiderian membrane appearance? Systematic review of studies using cone-beam computed tomography [J].
Eggmann, Florin ;
Connert, Thomas ;
Buhler, Julia ;
Dagassan-Berndt, Dorothea ;
Weiger, Roland ;
Walter, Clemens .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2017, 21 (05) :1611-1630
[10]   Variations in bone density at dental implant sites in different regions of the jawbone [J].
Fuh, L. -J. ;
Huang, H. -L. ;
Chen, C. -S. ;
Fu, K. -L. ;
Shen, Y. -W. ;
Tu, M. -G. ;
Shen, W. -C. ;
Hsu, J. -T. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2010, 37 (05) :346-351