A Dual-Process Perspective on Fluency-Based Aesthetics: The Pleasure-Interest Model of Aesthetic Liking

被引:211
作者
Graf, Laura K. M. [1 ]
Landwehr, Jan R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, D-60054 Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
empirical aesthetics; processing fluency; dual-process theories; interest; pleasure; boredom; confusion; epistemic motivation; need for cognitive enrichment; AUTOMATIC ATTITUDE ACTIVATION; MERE EXPOSURE; PERCEPTUAL FLUENCY; NEGATIVE AFFECT; PREFERENCE; ART; APPRECIATION; INFORMATION; COGNITION; JUDGMENT;
D O I
10.1177/1088868315574978
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In this article, we develop an account of how aesthetic preferences can be formed as a result of two hierarchical, fluency-based processes. Our model suggests that processing performed immediately upon encountering an aesthetic object is stimulus driven, and aesthetic preferences that accrue from this processing reflect aesthetic evaluations of pleasure or displeasure. When sufficient processing motivation is provided by a perceiver's need for cognitive enrichment and/or the stimulus' processing affordance, elaborate perceiver-driven processing can emerge, which gives rise to fluency-based aesthetic evaluations of interest, boredom, or confusion. Because the positive outcomes in our model are pleasure and interest, we call it the Pleasure-Interest Model of Aesthetic Liking (PIA Model). Theoretically, this model integrates a dual-process perspective and ideas from lay epistemology into processing fluency theory, and it provides a parsimonious framework to embed and unite a wealth of aesthetic phenomena, including contradictory preference patterns for easy versus difficult-to-process aesthetic stimuli.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 410
页数:16
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]   The Fluency Amplification Model: Fluent stimuli show more intense but not evidently more positive evaluations [J].
Albrecht, Sabine ;
Carbon, Claus-Christian .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2014, 148 :195-203
[2]   Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning [J].
Alter, Adam L. ;
Oppenheimer, Daniel M. ;
Epley, Nicholas ;
Eyre, Rebecca N. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2007, 136 (04) :569-576
[3]   The Benefits of Cognitive Disfluency [J].
Alter, Adam L. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 22 (06) :437-442
[4]   Disfluency prompts analytic thinking-But not always greater accuracy: Response to Thompson et al. (2013) [J].
Alter, Adam L. ;
Oppenheimer, Daniel M. ;
Epley, Nicholas .
COGNITION, 2013, 128 (02) :252-255
[5]   Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation [J].
Alter, Adam L. ;
Oppenheimer, Daniel M. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2009, 13 (03) :219-235
[6]  
[Anonymous], DUAL PROCESS THEORIE
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1951, Critique of Judgment
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1990, PSYCHOL INQ, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15327965PLI01031
[9]  
[Anonymous], AESTHETIC SCI CONNEC
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Metacognition: Knowing about knowing