PATERNALISM AND FAIRNESS IN CLINICAL RESEARCH

被引:11
作者
Jansen, Lynn A. [1 ,2 ]
Wall, Steven [3 ]
机构
[1] New York Med Coll, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
[2] St Vincents Manhattan, Manhattan, KS USA
[3] Bowling Green State Univ, Bowling Green, OH 43403 USA
关键词
paternalism; distributive fairness; basic liberty; research ethics;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00651.x
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, we defend the ethics of clinical research against the charge of paternalism. We do so not by denying that the ethics of clinical research is paternalistic, but rather by defending the legitimacy of paternalism in this context. Our aim is not to defend any particular set of paternalistic restrictions, but rather to make a general case for the permissibility of paternalistic restrictions in this context. Specifically, we argue that there is no basic liberty-right to participate in clinical research and that considerations of distributive fairness justify some paternalistic protections of research subjects.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 182
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [41] Beauchamp, Childress, J Med Philos
  • [42] Shiffrin S.V., Paternalism, Unconscionability Doctrine, and Accommodation, Philos Public Aff, 29, (2000)
  • [43] Philos Public Aff
  • [44] De Marneffe P., Philos Public Aff, pp. 77-78