Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: Anatomy, Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes

被引:65
作者
Erickson, Brandon J. [1 ]
Harris, Joshua D. [2 ,3 ]
Chalmers, Peter N. [1 ]
Bach, Bernard R., Jr. [1 ]
Verma, Nikhil N. [1 ]
Bush-Joseph, Charles A. [1 ]
Romeo, Anthony A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Midwest Orthopaed, 1611 W Harrison St,Suite 300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Houston Methodist Hosp, Dept Orthoped & Sports Med, Houston, TX USA
[3] Weill Cornell Coll Med, New York, NY USA
来源
SPORTS HEALTH-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH | 2015年 / 7卷 / 06期
关键词
ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction; Tommy John; elbow; surgical management; biomechanics; instability; throwing athlete; pitcher; LEAGUE BASEBALL PITCHERS; 2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; TOMMY JOHN SURGERY; BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION; DOCKING TECHNIQUE; MR ARTHROGRAPHY; ELBOW JOINT; INTERFERENCE SCREW; STRESS SONOGRAPHY; THROWING ATHLETE;
D O I
10.1177/1941738115607208
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Context: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries lead to pain and loss of performance in the thrower's elbow. Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) is a reliable treatment option for the symptomatic, deficient UCL. Injury to the UCL usually occurs because of chronic accumulation of microtrauma, although acute ruptures occur and an acute-on-chronic presentation is also common. Evidence Acquisition: Computerized databases, references from pertinent articles, and research institutions were searched for all studies using the search terms ulnar collateral ligament from 1970 until 2015. Study Design: Clinical review. Level of Evidence: Level 5. Results: All studies reporting outcomes for UCLR are level 4. Most modern fixation methodologies appear to be biomechanically and clinically equivalent. Viable graft choices include ipsilateral palmaris longus tendon autograft, gracilis or semitendinosus autograft, and allograft. Clinical studies report excellent outcomes of UCLR for both recreational and elite level athletes with regard to return to sport and postoperative performance. Complications, although rare, include graft rerupture or attenuation, ulnar nerve symptoms, stiffness, pain, and/or weakness leading to decreased performance. Conclusion: Injuries to the UCL have become commonplace among pitchers. Nonoperative treatment should be attempted, but the limited studies have not shown promising results. Operative treatment can be performed with several techniques, with retrospective studies showing promising results. Complications include ulnar neuropathy as well as failure to return to sport. Detailed preoperative planning, meticulous surgical technique, and a comprehensive rehabilitation program are essential components to achieving a satisfactory result.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 517
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Percutaneous lateral ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction
    Jens Dargel
    Klaus Burkhart
    Dietmar Pennig
    Gregor Stein
    Peer Eysel
    Lars Peter Müller
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2013, 21 : 450 - 455
  • [32] Reasons for Retirement Following Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Among Major League Baseball Pitchers
    Erickson, Brandon J.
    Ahn, Junyoung
    Chalmers, Peter N.
    Ahmad, Christopher S.
    Bach, Bernard R.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 5 (12)
  • [33] The History and Evolution of Elbow Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: from Tommy John to 2020
    Jensen, Andrew R.
    LaPrade, Matthew D.
    Turner, Travis W.
    Dines, Joshua S.
    Camp, Christopher L.
    CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE, 2020, 13 (03) : 349 - 360
  • [34] Do Outcomes or Subsequent Injuries Differ After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Palmaris Versus Hamstring Autograft?
    Erickson, Brandon J.
    Chalmers, Peter N.
    D'Angelo, John
    Ma, Kevin
    Dines, Joshua S.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (06) : 1473 - 1479
  • [35] Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Gracilis Tendon in Athletes With Intraligamentous Bony Excision Technique and Results
    Dugas, Jeffrey R.
    Bilotta, Jessica
    Watts, Chad D.
    Crum, Joshua A.
    Fleisig, Glenn S.
    McMichael, Christopher S.
    Cain, E. Lyle, Jr.
    Andrews, James R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (07) : 1578 - 1582
  • [36] Anterior and posterior bands of the anterior bundle in the elbow ulnar collateral ligament: ultrasound anatomy
    Yoshida, Masahito
    Goto, Hideyuki
    Takenaga, Tetsuya
    Tsuchiya, Atsushi
    Sugimoto, Katsumasa
    Musahl, Volker
    Fu, Freddie
    Otsuka, Takanobu
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2017, 26 (10) : 1803 - 1809
  • [37] Strength of ulnar fixation in ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison of traditional bone tunnels to the tension-slide technique
    Jackson, Atiba
    Maerz, Tristan
    Koueiter, Denise M.
    Andrecovich, Christopher J.
    Baker, Kevin C.
    Anderson, Kyle
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2012, 21 (12) : 1674 - 1679
  • [38] Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Erickson, Brandon J.
    Chalmers, Peter N.
    Bush-Joseph, Charles A.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 3 (12)
  • [39] Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in javelin throwers: an analysis of return to play rates and patient outcomes
    Hadley, Christopher J.
    Rao, Somnath
    Erickson, Brandon J.
    Cohen, Steven B.
    Dodson, Christopher C.
    Ciccotti, Michael G.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2022, 31 (03) : 488 - 494
  • [40] Outcomes following arthroscopic posteromedial osteophyte resection and risk of future ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction
    Paul, Ryan W.
    Zareef, Usman
    Hall, Anya T.
    Lencer, Adam J.
    Ciccotti, Michael G.
    Cohen, Steven B.
    Tjoumakaris, Fotios P.
    Thomas, Stephen J.
    Erickson, Brandon J.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2023, 32 (01) : 141 - 149