A Post-SOX Examination of Factors Associated with the Size of Internal Audit Functions

被引:67
作者
Anderson, Urton L. [2 ]
Christ, Margaret H. [3 ]
Johnstone, Karla M. [1 ]
Rittenberg, Larry E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI 53715 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
internal audit; resource allocation; budgeting; staffing; BOARD CHARACTERISTICS; COMMITTEE; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.2308/acch-50115
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study develops and tests a conceptual model articulating factors associated with internal audit function size in the post-SOX era. These factors include audit committee characteristics, internal audit characteristics and mission, internal audit activities performed by others (including outsourced providers and other divisions within the organization), and organization characteristics. Results from a survey of 173 public and private companies reveal that internal audit function size is positively associated with: (1) better audit committee governance, (2) greater organizational experience of the chief audit executive, (3) missions involving IT auditing, (4) the use of sophisticated audit technologies, (5) the use of a staffing model in which internal audit is used for rotational leadership development, (6) organization size, and (7) the number of foreign subsidiaries that the organization possesses. Further, internal audit function size is inversely associated with: (1) the percentage of internal audit employees that are Certified Internal Auditors, and (2) the extent of assurance and compliance activities outsourced to outsiders. These results contribute to prior literature on internal audit function size by considering a variety of factors that are associated with internal audit function size in the contemporary era.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 191
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Abdel-Khalik A.R., 1993, Journal of Accounting, Auditing Finance, V8, P31, DOI DOI 10.1177/0148558X9300800103
[2]  
Albrecht W.S., 1988, Evaluating the Effectiveness of Internal Audit Departments
[3]  
Anderson R. J., 2011, IMPERATIVES CHANGE I
[4]   Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt [J].
Anderson, RC ;
Mansi, SA ;
Reeb, DM .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2004, 37 (03) :315-342
[5]  
Anderson S. W., 2012, USE MANAGEMENT CONTR
[6]  
Anderson U., 2009, IMPLEMENTING PROFESS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1999, REP REC BLUE RIBB CO
[8]  
[Anonymous], AS 2201: An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting That is Integrated with An Audit of Financial Statements
[9]  
Baker Neil, 2009, Internal Auditor, V66, P30
[10]   Audit committee characteristics and investment in internal auditing [J].
Barua, Abhijit ;
Rama, Dasaratha V. ;
Sharma, Vineeta .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2010, 29 (05) :503-513