Prediction of Optimal Cytoreductive Surgery of Serous Ovarian Cancer With Gene Expression Data

被引:9
作者
Abdallah, Reem [1 ]
Chon, Hye Sook [1 ]
Zgheib, Nadim Bou [1 ]
Marchion, Douglas C. [1 ]
Wenham, Robert M. [1 ]
Lancaster, Johnathan M. [1 ]
Gonzalez-Bosquet, Jesus [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Gynecol Oncol Program,Dept Womens Oncol, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[2] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Gynecol Oncol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
Gene expression; Microarrays; Optimal debulking; Ovarian cancer; Suboptimal debulking; GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY-GROUP; EPITHELIAL OVARIAN; FALLOPIAN-TUBE; ACTIVIN-A; INTRAPERITONEAL CISPLATIN; SUBOPTIMAL CYTOREDUCTION; TUMOR HETEROGENEITY; SURVIVAL; CARCINOMA; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1097/IGC.0000000000000449
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives Cytoreductive surgery is the cornerstone of ovarian cancer (OVCA) treatment. Detractors of initial maximal surgical effort argue that aggressive tumor biology will dictate survival, not the surgical effort. We investigated the role of biology in achieving optimal cytoreduction in serous OVCA using microarray gene expression analysis. Methods For the initial model, we used a gene expression signature from a microarray expression analysis of 124 women with serous OVCA, defining optimal cytoreduction as removal of all disease greater than 1 cm (with 64 women having optimal and 60 suboptimal cytoreduction). We then applied this model to 2 independent data sets: the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study (AOCS; 190 samples) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; 468 samples). We performed a second analysis, defining optimal cytoreduction as removal of all disease to microscopic residual, using data from AOCS to create the gene signature and validating results in TCGA data set. Results Of the 12,718 genes included in the initial analysis, 58 predicted accuracy of cytoreductive surgery 69% of the time (P = 0.005). The performance of this classifier, measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, was 73%. When applied to TCGA and AOCS, accuracy was 56% (P = 0.16) and 62% (P = 0.01), respectively, with performance at 57% and 65%, respectively. In the second analysis, 220 genes predicted accuracy of cytoreductive surgery in the AOCS set 74% of the time, with performance of 73%. When these results were validated in TCGA set, accuracy was 57% (P = 0.31) and performance was at 62%. Conclusion Gene expression data, used as a proxy of tumor biology, do not predict accurately nor consistently the ability to perform optimal cytoreductive surgery. Other factors, including surgical effort, may also explain part of the model. Additional studies integrating more biological and clinical data may improve the prediction model.
引用
收藏
页码:1000 / 1009
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [21] p53 and mdm2 as prognostic indicators in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer:: A multivariate analysis
    Dogan, E
    Saygili, U
    Tuna, B
    Gol, M
    Gürel, D
    Acar, B
    Koyuncuoglu, M
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2005, 97 (01) : 46 - 52
  • [22] RETRACTED: An integrated genomic-based approach to individualized treatment of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer (Retracted article. See vol. 30, pg. 678, 2012)
    Dressman, Holly K.
    Berchuck, Andrew
    Chan, Gina
    Zhai, Jun
    Bild, Andrea
    Sayer, Robyn
    Cragun, Janiel
    Clarke, Jennifer
    Whitaker, Regina S.
    Li, LiHua
    Gray, Jonathan
    Marks, Jeffrey
    Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.
    Potti, Anil
    West, Mike
    Nevins, Joseph R.
    Lancaster, Johnathan M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (05) : 517 - 525
  • [23] 2004 consensus statements on the management of ovarian cancer: final document of the 3rd International Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference (GCIG OCCC 2004)
    du Bois, A
    Quinn, M
    Thigpen, T
    Vermorken, J
    Avall-Lundqvist, E
    Bookman, M
    Bowtell, D
    Brady, M
    Casado, A
    Cervantes, A
    Eisenhauer, E
    Friedlaender, M
    Fujiwara, K
    Grenman, S
    Guastalla, JP
    Harper, P
    Hogberg, T
    Kaye, S
    Kitchener, H
    Kristensen, G
    Mannel, R
    Meier, W
    Miller, B
    Neijt, JP
    Oza, A
    Ozols, R
    Parmar, M
    Pecorelli, S
    Pfisterer, J
    Poveda, A
    Provencher, D
    Pujade-Lauraine, E
    Randall, M
    Rochon, J
    Rustin, G
    Sagae, S
    Stehman, F
    Stuart, G
    Trimble, E
    Vasey, P
    Vergote, I
    Verheijen, R
    Wagner, U
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 : 7 - 12
  • [24] Role of surgery in ovarian carcinoma
    Fader, Amanda Nickles
    Rose, Peter G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (20) : 2873 - 2883
  • [25] p53 overexpression is associated with cytoreduction and response to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer
    Ferrandina, G
    Fagotti, A
    Salerno, MG
    Natali, PG
    Mottolese, M
    Maneschi, F
    De Pasqua, A
    Benedetti-Panici, P
    Mancuso, S
    Scambia, G
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 81 (04) : 733 - 740
  • [26] Quantification of p53 in epithelial ovarian cancer
    Geisler, JP
    Geisler, HE
    Wiemann, MC
    Givens, SS
    Zhou, Z
    Miller, GA
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1997, 66 (03) : 435 - 438
  • [27] THE EFFECT OF DIAMETER OF LARGEST RESIDUAL DISEASE ON SURVIVAL AFTER PRIMARY CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH SUBOPTIMAL RESIDUAL EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CARCINOMA
    HOSKINS, WJ
    MCGUIRE, WP
    BRADY, MF
    HOMESLEY, HD
    CREASMAN, WT
    BERMAN, M
    BALL, H
    BEREK, JS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 170 (04) : 974 - 980
  • [28] Predicting the Outcome of Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer A Review
    Ibeanu, Okechukwu A.
    Bristow, Robert E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2010, 20 : S1 - S11
  • [29] Significance of age and comorbidity on treatment modality, treatment adherence, and prognosis in elderly ovarian cancer patients
    Jorgensen, Trine Lembrecht
    Teiblum, Sandra
    Paludan, Merete
    Poulsen, Laurids Ostergaard
    Jorgensen, Anni Young Stensgard
    Bruun, Karin Herskind
    Hallas, Jesper
    Herrstedt, Jorn
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 127 (02) : 367 - 374
  • [30] Genetic intra-tumour heterogeneity in epithelial ovarian cancer and its implications for molecular diagnosis of tumours
    Khalique, L.
    Ayhan, A.
    Weale, M. E.
    Jacobs, I. J.
    Ramus, S. J.
    Gayther, S. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2007, 211 (03) : 286 - 295