Cytologic grade independently predicts survival of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma

被引:9
作者
Eltoum, IA
Eloubeidi, MA
Chhieng, DC
Tamhane, A
Crowe, R
Jhala, D
St John, KD
Wilcox, CM
Siegal, GP
Vickers, S
Jhala, NC
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Div Anat Pathol, Dept Pathol, Birmingham, AL USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Dept Med, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Surg, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
tumor grade; pancreatic adenocarcinoma; endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration; prognosis; tumor stage;
D O I
10.1309/044PL9GT0C3DB4N4
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Our objectives were to devise a cytologic grading system and determine whether it would predict survival of patients with solid-type pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We evaluated 116 consecutive patients from July 2000 to November 2002: they were followed up until September 2003. We scored the following features on rapid Romanowsky-stained endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration smears: cell group architecture, single cells, nuclear grade, mucus, bizarre cells, and necrosis. A cytologic grade (low vs high) was assigned. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of 6-month survival was 76% (SE, 7%) for patients vvith low-grade tumors vs 50% (SE, 6%) for patients with high-grade carcinoma. The median survival for patients with low-grade vs high-grade tumors was 1 year vs 6 months, respectively (chi(2) = 4.45; P = .035). Cox proportional hazards regression showed tumor stage, cancer-specific treatment, and cytologic grade to be independent predictors of survival (P = .001). No other factors (age, mass location, placement of stent, presence of concomitant chronic pancreatitis, race, sex) predicted survival. We devised a grading system that independently predicted survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 707
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Adjuvant therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: What have we learned since 1985?
    Abrams, RA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (04): : 3 - 9
  • [2] A proposal for a new and more practical grading scheme for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Adsay, NV
    Basturk, C
    Bonnett, M
    Kilinc, N
    Andea, AA
    Feng, JN
    Che, MX
    Aulicino, MR
    Levi, E
    Cheng, JD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (06) : 724 - 733
  • [3] *AM CANC SOC, DET GUID PANCR CANC
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2002, AJCC CANC STAGING HD
  • [5] Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of malignant pancreatic lesions
    Bhutani, MS
    Hawes, RH
    Baron, PL
    Sanders-Cliette, A
    van Velse, A
    Osborne, JF
    Hoffman, BJ
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 29 (09) : 854 - 858
  • [6] Relationship between hospital volume and late survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Birkmeyer, JD
    Warshaw, AL
    Finlayson, SRG
    Grove, MR
    Tosteson, ANA
    [J]. SURGERY, 1999, 126 (02) : 178 - 183
  • [7] Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality with pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Birkmeyer, JD
    Finlayson, SRG
    Tosteson, ANA
    Sharp, SM
    Warshaw, AL
    Fisher, ES
    [J]. SURGERY, 1999, 125 (03) : 250 - 256
  • [8] CHANG KJ, 1994, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V89, P263
  • [9] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy - A study of 103 cases
    Chhieng, DC
    Jhala, D
    Jhala, N
    Eltoum, I
    Chen, VK
    Vickers, S
    Heslin, MJ
    Wilcox, CM
    Eloubeidi, MA
    [J]. CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2002, 96 (04) : 232 - 239
  • [10] GROWTH-BEHAVIOR OF HUMAN PANCREATIC-CARCINOMA XENOGRAFT CORRELATES WITH NUCLEAR FEATURES
    COEN, H
    KINT, H
    KUYPER, CF
    JONGES, GN
    DUMAREY, N
    PAUWELS, M
    KLOPPEL, G
    ROELS, F
    [J]. CYTOMETRY, 1992, 13 (07): : 775 - 781