Forest attributes estimation using aerial laser scanner and TM data

被引:22
作者
Shataee, Sh. [1 ]
机构
[1] Gorgan Univ Agr Sci & Nat Resources, Dept Forestry, Gorgan 386, Iran
关键词
forest attributes estimation; ALS; TM; non-parametric algorithms; STEM VOLUME; STAND VOLUMES; TREE HEIGHT; BASAL AREA; LIDAR DATA; AIRBORNE; PREDICTION; RETRIEVAL; INVENTORY; IMPUTATION;
D O I
10.5424/fs/2013223-03874
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Aim of study: The aim of this study was performance of four non-parametric algorithms including the k-NN, SVR, RF and ANN to estimate forest volume and basal area attributes using combination of Aerial Laser Scanner and Landsat-TM data. Area of study: Data in small part of a mixed managed forest in the Waldkirch region, Germany. Material and methods: The volume/ha and basal area/ha in the 411 circular plots were estimated based on DBH and height of trees using volume functions of study area. The low density ALS raw data as first and last pulses were prepared and automatically classified into vegetation and ground returns to generate two fine resolution digital terrain and surface models after noise removing. Plot-based height and density metrics were extracted from ALS data and used both separated and combined with orthorectified and processed TM bands. The algorithms implemented with different options including k-NN with different distance measures, SVR with the best regularized parameters for four kernel types, RF with regularized decision tree parameters and ANN with different types of networks. The algorithm performances were validated using computing absolute and percentage RMSe and bias on unused test samples. Main results: Results showed that among four methods, SVR using the RBF kernel could better estimate volume/ha with lower RMSe and bias (156.02 m(3) ha(-1) and 0.48, respectively) compared to others. In basal area/ha, k-NN could generate results with similar RMSe (11.79 m(3) ha(-1)) but unbiased (0.03) compared to SVR with RMSe of 11.55 m(3) ha(-1) but slightly biased (-1.04). Research highlights: Results exposed that combining Lidar with TM data could improve estimations compared to using only Lidar or TM data.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 496
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Andersen H.E., 2003, Proceedings, 2nd Inter-national Precision Forestry Symposium, P45
[2]  
Andersen H.-E., 2003, THESIS U WASHINGTON
[3]  
[Anonymous], INT ARCH PHOTOGRAM 3
[4]   Object-based retrieval of biophysical canopy variables using artificial neural nets and radiative transfer models [J].
Atzberger, C .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 93 (1-2) :53-67
[5]  
Breidenbach J, 2010, EUROPEAN J FOREST RE
[6]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[7]  
Chen G, 2010, 18 INT C GEOINF 18 2
[8]   Lidar calibration and validation for geometric-optical modeling with Landsat imagery [J].
Chen, Gang ;
Wulder, Michael A. ;
White, Joanne C. ;
Hilker, Thomas ;
Coops, Nicholas C. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 124 :384-393
[9]   A Support Vector Regression Approach to Estimate Forest Biophysical Parameters at the Object Level Using Airborne Lidar Transects and QuickBird Data [J].
Chen, Gang ;
Hay, Geoffrey J. .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2011, 77 (07) :733-741
[10]  
Cherkassky V, 1997, IEEE Trans Neural Netw, V8, P1564, DOI 10.1109/TNN.1997.641482