Which institutional investor types are the most informed?

被引：1

作者：

Chen, Zhe ^{[1
]}

Forsberg, David ^{[2
,3
]}

Gallagher, David R. ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Acad Asset Management, Sydney, NSW, Australia

[2] Macquarie Grad Sch Management MGSM, Macquarie Pk, NSW, Australia

[3] Capital Markets CRC Ltd, Sydney, NSW, Australia

来源：

ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE | 2019年 / 59卷

关键词：

Portfolio holdings; Institutional investors; Holdings informativeness; Stock picking; Market timing; MUTUAL FUND PERFORMANCE; HEDGE FUNDS; COSTLY INFORMATION; MARKET; RISK; TIME; MANAGERS; STOCKS; EFFICIENCY; BIASES;

D O I：

10.1111/acfi.12378

中图分类号：

F8 [财政、金融];

学科分类号：

0202 ;

摘要：

We examine the informativeness of quarterly disclosed portfolio holdings across four institutional investor types: hedge funds, mutual funds, pension funds and private banking firms. Overweight positions outperform underweight positions only for hedge funds. By decomposing holdings and stock returns, we find that hedge funds are superior to other institutional investors both at picking industries and stocks and that they are better at forecasting long-term as well as short-term returns. Furthermore, our results show that hedge funds, mutual funds and pension funds are able to successfully time the market. The outperformance of hedge funds is not explained by a liquidity premium.

引用

页码：449 / 480

页数：32

共 58 条

[1] The performance of hedge funds: Risk, return, and incentives [J].