Bibliometric analysis of six nursing journals from the Web of Science, 2012-2017

被引:45
作者
del Carmen Gimenez-Espert, Maria [1 ]
Javier Prado-Gasco, Vicente [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Dept Nursing, Valencia, Spain
[2] Univ Valencia, Dept Social Psychol, Valencia, Spain
关键词
bibliometric analysis; citation analysis; nursing; Science Citation Index; scientific production; Web of Science; CITATION ANALYSIS; REFERENCES;
D O I
10.1111/jan.13868
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim The purpose of this study was to perform a bibliometric analysis of the six most important nursing journals according to the impact factor of the Science Citation Index through Web of Science((R)). The following journals were included: International Journal of Nursing Studies, Nurse Education Today, Journal of Nursing Scholarship, Nursing Outlook, Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing and the Journal of Advanced Nursing. Background In the nursing field, bibliometric analysis and maps have been used to analyse the production of some journals but not for the comparison of different journals. Design/Method Using descriptive bibliometrics, we studied scientific production of different journals and bibliometric maps were used to visualize the content of published articles. Results The six journals included showed that 3,937 articles were written by 1,1371 authors from 2,980 institutions and 84 countries from 2012 - 2017. Journal of Advanced Nursing had a greater number of publications and citations. The most prolific authors showed a tendency to publish first in Journal of Advanced Nursing and then in International Journal of Nursing Studies and Nurse Education Today. The frequency of citation was higher in International Journal of Nursing Studies followed by Journal of Advanced Nursing. The most collaborative authors and those with the most co-citations published more than half of their publications in Journal of Advanced Nursing. The topics most commonly researched by these authors were job satisfaction, collaborative practices, and nurse leaders. Conclusion This bibliometric analysis contributes to the understanding of the current state of nursing research and its evolution.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 554
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Nurses' reports of working conditions and hospital quality of care in 12 countries in Europe [J].
Aiken, Linda H. ;
Sloane, Douglas M. ;
Bruyneel, Luk ;
Van den Heede, Koen ;
Sermeus, Walter .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2013, 50 (02) :143-153
[2]   TOWARD A DEFINITION OF BIBLIOMETRICS [J].
BROADUS, RN .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1987, 12 (5-6) :373-379
[3]   The research assessment exercise in nursing: learning from the past, looking to the future [J].
Cecil, R ;
Thompson, K ;
Parahoo, K .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2006, 15 (04) :395-402
[4]  
Cheng W F, 2017, Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi, V33, P233, DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.04.009
[5]  
Davis P., 2014, SCHOLARLY KITCHEN
[6]   Analysis of international content of ranked nursing journals in 2005 using ex post facto design [J].
Dougherty, Molly C. ;
Lin, Shu-Yuan ;
McKenna, Hugh P. ;
Seers, Kate ;
Keeney, Sinead .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2011, 67 (06) :1358-1369
[7]   A bibliometric analysis of the Pain journal as a representation of progress and trends in the field [J].
Dubner, Ronald .
PAIN, 2009, 142 (1-2) :9-10
[8]   Bibliometric review of references of nursing research papers during the decade 1994-2003 in Turkey [J].
Ergul, S. ;
Ardahan, M. ;
Temel, A. B. ;
Yildirim, B. Oe. .
INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW, 2010, 57 (01) :49-55
[9]   A bibliometric analysis of the Journal of Membrane Science (1976-2010) [J].
Fu, Hui-Zhen ;
Ho, Yuh-Shan .
ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, 2015, 33 (04) :698-713
[10]  
Haddad Mark, 2017, Nurs Stand, V31, P55, DOI 10.7748/ns.2017.e10830