Psammomatoid and trabecular juvenile ossifying fibroma of the craniofacial skeleton: Two distinct clinicopathologic entities

被引:139
作者
El-Mofty, S
机构
[1] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Washington University, St Louis, MO
[2] Departments of Pathology and Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, MO
[3] Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Campus Box 8118, St Louis, MO 63110
来源
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY | 2002年 / 93卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1067/moe.2002.121545
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The term juvenile ossifying fibroma is used in the literature in naming 2 microscopically distinct fibro-osseous lesions of the craniofacial skeleton. One is characterized by small uniform spherical ossicles resembling psammoma bodies (psammomatoid juvenile ossifying fibroma). The other is distinguished by trabeculae of fibrillary osteoid and woven bone (trabecular juvenile ossifying fibroma). Three new cases of each type are reported, and the literature is extensively reviewed for published cases of these 2 entities. Psammomatoid juvenile ossifying fibroma is reported more commonly than trabecular juvenile ossifying fibroma. It affects patients from a wider age range (3 months to 72 years) and an older mean age range (16-33 years) as compared with 2 to 12 years and 81/2 to 12 years, respectively, for trabecular juvenile ossifying fibroma. In both types there is a slight male predominance and the lesions are unencapsulated and tend to infiltrate adjacent bone. A significant difference between the 2 tumors is their site of occurrence. Although psammomatoid juvenile ossifying fibroma occurs predominantly in the sinonasal and orbital bones, trabecular juvenile ossifying fibroma predominantly affects the jaws. Aggressive growth occurs in some-but not all-cases of both types. Such behavior may be related to younger patient age and the concurrent development of aneurysmal bone cysts, which is seen more frequently in psammomatoid juvenile ossifying fibroma. This study demonstrates that not only histologic but also demographic and clinical differences between psammomatoid juvenile ossifying fibroma and trabecular juvenile ossifying fibroma warrant their classification as 2 distinct clinicopathologic entities.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 304
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Benjamins CE., 1938, Acta Otolaryngol, V26, P26, DOI [10.3109/00016483809118422, DOI 10.3109/00016483809118422]
[2]  
BERTRAND B, 1993, LARYNGOSCOPE, V103, P1385
[3]  
DEHNER LP, 1973, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V31, P364, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197302)31:2<364::AID-CNCR2820310216>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-Z
[5]  
El-Mofty SK, 1999, SEMIN DIAGN PATHOL, V16, P302
[6]  
El-Mofty SK, 2001, DIAGNOSTIC SURG PATH, P505
[7]   CT and MRI of congenital sinonasal ossifying fibroma [J].
Engelbrecht, V ;
Preis, S ;
Hassler, W ;
Lenard, HG .
NEURORADIOLOGY, 1999, 41 (07) :526-529
[8]   OSSIFYING FIBROMA - A CLINICOPATHOLOGIC STUDY OF 64 CASES [J].
EVERSOLE, LR ;
LEIDER, AS ;
NELSON, K .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1985, 60 (05) :505-511
[9]  
GARDNER J A, 1960, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, V13, P1288, DOI 10.1016/0030-4220(60)90290-5
[10]  
GOGL H, 1949, Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol, V83, P1