Orthographic, Phonological, and Semantic Dynamics During Visual Word Recognition in Deaf Versus Hearing Adults

被引:2
作者
Peleg, Orna [1 ,2 ]
Ben-hur, Galia [1 ]
Segal, Osnat [3 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Program Cognit Studies Language & Its Uses, Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sagol Sch Neurosci, Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Dept Commun Disorders, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
来源
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH | 2020年 / 63卷 / 07期
关键词
HARD-OF-HEARING; READING-COMPREHENSION; LITERACY OUTCOMES; AWARENESS; CHILDREN; READERS; SKILLS; INSTRUCTION; PREDICTORS; AMBIGUITY;
D O I
10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00285
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: Studies on reading in individuals with severe-to-profound hearing loss (deaf) raise the possibility that, due to deficient phonological coding, deaf individuals may rely more on orthographic-semantic links than on orthographic-phonological links. However, the relative contribution of phonological and semantic information to visual word recognition in deaf individuals was not directly assessed in these studies. The aim of the present study, therefore, was to examine the interplay between orthographic, phonological, and semantic representations during visual word recognition, in deaf versus hearing adults. Method: Deaf and hearing participants were asked to perform a visual lexical decision task in Hebrew. The critical stimuli consisted of three types of Hebrew words, which differ in terms of their relationship between orthography, phonology, and semantics: unambiguous words, homonyms, and homographs. Results: In the hearing group, phonological effects were more pronounced than semantic effects: Homographs (multiple pronunciations) were recognized significantly slower than homonyms or unambiguous words (one pronunciation). However, there was no significant difference between homonyms (multiple meanings) and unambiguous words (one meaning). In contrast, in the deaf group, there was no significant difference among the three word types, indicating that visual word recognition, in these participants, is driven primarily by orthography. Conclusion: While visual word recognition in hearing readers is accomplished mainly via orthographic-phonological connections, deaf readers rely mainly on orthographic-semantic connections.
引用
收藏
页码:2334 / 2344
页数:11
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Allen T., 1986, Deaf children in America pp, P161, DOI DOI 10.1177/15257401050270010201
  • [2] Allen T. E., 1994, WHO ARE DEAF H UNPUB
  • [3] PHONOLOGY AND READING: A RESPONSE TO WANG, TREZEK, LUCKNER, AND PAUL
    Allen, Thomas E.
    Clark, M. Diane
    del Giudice, Alex
    Koo, Daniel
    Lieberman, Amy
    Mayberry, Rachel
    Miller, Paul
    [J]. AMERICAN ANNALS OF THE DEAF, 2009, 154 (04) : 338 - 345
  • [4] Visual Word Recognition in Deaf Readers: Lexicality Is Modulated by Communication Mode
    Barca, Laura
    Pezzulo, Giovanni
    Castrataro, Marianna
    Rinaldi, Pasquale
    Caselli, Maria Cristina
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (03):
  • [5] Beech J.R., 1997, J RES READ, V20, P105, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-9817.00024
  • [6] Orthographic and phonological preview benefits: Parafoveal processing in skilled and less-skilled deaf readers
    Belanger, Nathalie N.
    Mayberry, Rachel I.
    Rayner, Keith
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 66 (11) : 2237 - 2252
  • [7] Effects of alphabeticality, practice and type of instruction on reading an artificial script: An fMRI study
    Bitan, T
    Manor, D
    Morocz, IA
    Karni, A
    [J]. COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2005, 25 (01): : 90 - 106
  • [8] Phonological Ambiguity Modulates Resolution of Semantic Ambiguity During Reading: An fMRI Study of Hebrew
    Bitan, Tali
    Kaftory, Asaf
    Meiri-Leib, Adi
    Eviatar, Zohar
    Peleg, Orna
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 31 (07) : 759 - 777
  • [9] DEAFNESS, SPELLING AND RHYME - HOW SPELLING SUPPORTS WRITTEN WORD AND PICTURE RHYMING SKILLS IN DEAF SUBJECTS
    CAMPBELL, R
    WRIGHT, H
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 40 (04): : 771 - 788
  • [10] Chamberlain C, 2000, LANGUAGE ACQUISITION BY EYE, P221