Pressure electroosmotic dewatering with continuous removal of electrolysis products

被引:42
作者
Larue, O.
Wakeman, R. J.
Tarleton, E. S.
Vorobiev, E.
机构
[1] Univ Technol Compiegne, Dept Chem Engn, F-60205 Compiegne, France
[2] Loughborough Univ Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Adv Separat Technol Grp, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England
关键词
filtration; suspension; bentonite; electric field; electro-osmosis; electrolysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.ces.2006.02.006
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Pressurised electroosmotic dewatering (PED) is usually implemented in classical filters with the electrodes making a direct contact with the material or the filter cloths. Thus, electrolysis products generated at the electrodes (gas, ions) tend to accumulate in the solid/liquid mixture being dewatered. This results in a non-uniform distribution of water content, porosity, electric field intensity, and particle zeta potential throughout the mixture, affecting progress of the PED process. This paper proposes a specific design of filter press to study PED in the absence of disturbances from electrolysis products. An experimental study was carried out on a gelatinous bentonite suspension at 8.5% w/w solid. The influence of the ionic conductivity of suspension (2-25mS/cm), the current intensity (20-300mA) and the pressure (2.5-15bar) were investigated. In order to improve the energetic yield of PED, the conductivity and current intensity should be limited, as observed in earlier. works. The pressure increase considerably aids the water removal and leads to better product dryness. For PED at 15bar and 100mA, the bentonite reached 40%w/w solid for 0.7kWh/kg of water removed. This study emphasises that to analyse PED precisely it is important to clarify the dependence of the electroosmotic flow rate on the porosity and pressure. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4732 / 4740
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Electric field enhanced crossflow microfiltration of hydrophobically modified water soluble polymers [J].
Akay, G ;
Wakeman, RJ .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1997, 131 (1-2) :229-236
[2]  
Barton WA, 1999, DRY TECHNOL, V17, P497
[3]  
GHIRISAN A, 2002, T FILTR SOC, V2, P56
[4]   Optimal off-time in interrupted electroosmotic dewatering [J].
Gopalakrishnan, S ;
Mujumdar, AS ;
Weber, ME .
SEPARATIONS TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 6 (03) :197-200
[5]   Improvement of dead-end filtration of biopolymers with pressure electrofiltration [J].
Hofmann, R ;
Posten, C .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2003, 58 (17) :3847-3858
[6]   ANALYSIS OF ELECTROOSMOTIC DEWATERING [J].
IWATA, M ;
IGAMI, H ;
MURASE, T ;
YOSHIDA, H .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN, 1991, 24 (01) :45-50
[7]  
Ju S., 1991, Separations Technology, V1, P214, DOI [10.1016/0956-9618(91)80016-S, DOI 10.1080/07373939108916713]
[8]   Sedimentation and water electrolysis effects in electrofiltration of kaolin suspension [J].
Larue, O ;
Vorobiev, E .
AICHE JOURNAL, 2004, 50 (12) :3120-3133
[9]  
Larue O, 2001, T FILTRATION SOC, V1, P31
[10]   ELECTROOSMOTIC DEWATERING OF CLAYS .3. INFLUENCE OF CLAY TYPE, EXCHANGEABLE CATIONS, AND ELECTRODE MATERIALS [J].
LOCKHART, NC .
COLLOIDS AND SURFACES, 1983, 6 (03) :253-269