Numerical Investigation on Direct MLPG for 2D and 3D Potential Problems

被引:0
|
作者
Mazzia, Annamaria [1 ]
Pini, Giorgio [1 ]
Sartoretto, Flavio [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dipartimento ICEA, I-35121 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Ca Foscari Venezia, DAIS, I-10173 Venice, Italy
来源
关键词
Meshless Methods; Poisson Problem; Generalized Moving Least Squares; Radial Basis Functions; Tensor Product Functions; MESHLESS SOLUTION; GALERKIN METHOD; ELEMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Pure meshless techniques are promising methods for solving Partial Differential Equations (PDE). They alleviate difficulties,both in designing discretization meshes, and in refining/coarsening, a task which is demanded e.g. in adaptive strategies. Mesh less Local Petrov Galerkin (MLPG) methods are pure meshless techniques that receive increasing attention. Very recently, new methods, called Direct MLPG (DMLPG), have been proposed. They rely upon approximating PDE via the Generalized Moving Least Square method. DMLPG methods alleviate some difficulties of MLPG, e.g. numerical integration of tricky, non polynomial factors, in weak forms. DMLPG techniques require lower computational costs respect to their MLPG counterparts. In this paper we numerically analyze the solution of test 2D problems via DMLPG. We report about our expansion of meshless techniques to 3D problems. Finally, we perform comparisons between DMLPG and two MLPG techniques, when-solving 3D problems..
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 209
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Investigation of the Thermal Conductivity of Materials in 2D/3D Heterostructures
    Kaya, Onurcan
    Donmezer, Nazli
    2021 IEEE 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NANOTECHNOLOGY (IEEE NANO 2021), 2021, : 374 - 377
  • [42] MLPG_R Method for Numerical Simulation of 2D Breaking Waves
    Ma, Q. W.
    Zhou, J. T.
    CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES, 2009, 43 (03): : 277 - 303
  • [43] Numerical Solution of 2D and 3D Scattering Problems on a Dielectric Body by a Method of Optimum Simple Iteration
    Kulikov, Sergey P.
    PIERS 2009 MOSCOW VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 1445 - 1449
  • [44] Numerical Solution of Transonic and Supersonic 2D and 3D Fluid-Elastic Structure Interaction Problems
    Dobes, J.
    Fuerst, J.
    Deconinck, H.
    Fort, J.
    NUMERICAL MATHEMATICS AND ADVANCED APPLICATIONS, 2008, : 539 - +
  • [45] A new global and direct integral formulation for 2D potential problems
    Zhang, Chao
    Fu, Zhuojia
    Zhang, Yaoming
    ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS, 2021, 125 : 233 - 240
  • [46] 21/2D or 3D?
    Roth, S
    Küster, B
    Sura, H
    KUNSTSTOFFE-PLAST EUROPE, 2004, 94 (07): : 65 - 67
  • [47] 2D and 3D on demand
    Philippi, Anne
    F & M; Feinwerktechnik, Mikrotechnik, Messtechnik, 1998, 106 (06): : 412 - 414
  • [48] From 2D to 3D
    Steven De Feyter
    Nature Chemistry, 2011, 3 (1) : 14 - 15
  • [49] Numerical solution of 2D elastostatic problems formulated by potential functions
    Morales, J. L.
    Moreno, J. A.
    Alhama, F.
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2013, 37 (09) : 6339 - 6353
  • [50] Numerical investigation of sewage sludge combustion in a fluidized bed reactor: A comparison of 2D and 3D simulations
    Dottei, Alexander
    Holtz, Dorian
    Mueller, Karsten
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 428