Numerical Investigation on Direct MLPG for 2D and 3D Potential Problems

被引:0
|
作者
Mazzia, Annamaria [1 ]
Pini, Giorgio [1 ]
Sartoretto, Flavio [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dipartimento ICEA, I-35121 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Ca Foscari Venezia, DAIS, I-10173 Venice, Italy
来源
关键词
Meshless Methods; Poisson Problem; Generalized Moving Least Squares; Radial Basis Functions; Tensor Product Functions; MESHLESS SOLUTION; GALERKIN METHOD; ELEMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Pure meshless techniques are promising methods for solving Partial Differential Equations (PDE). They alleviate difficulties,both in designing discretization meshes, and in refining/coarsening, a task which is demanded e.g. in adaptive strategies. Mesh less Local Petrov Galerkin (MLPG) methods are pure meshless techniques that receive increasing attention. Very recently, new methods, called Direct MLPG (DMLPG), have been proposed. They rely upon approximating PDE via the Generalized Moving Least Square method. DMLPG methods alleviate some difficulties of MLPG, e.g. numerical integration of tricky, non polynomial factors, in weak forms. DMLPG techniques require lower computational costs respect to their MLPG counterparts. In this paper we numerically analyze the solution of test 2D problems via DMLPG. We report about our expansion of meshless techniques to 3D problems. Finally, we perform comparisons between DMLPG and two MLPG techniques, when-solving 3D problems..
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 209
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Return Channel Vane Aerodynamics with 2D and 3D Vanes
    Hildebrandt, A.
    Schilling, F.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBINE TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2016, VOL 2D, 2016,
  • [22] 2D AND 3D COMPUTATIONS OF LOSSY EIGENVALUE PROBLEMS
    SCHMITT, D
    STEFFEN, B
    WEILAND, T
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1994, 30 (05) : 3578 - 3581
  • [23] An investigation of 2D and 3D spatial and mathematical abilities
    Ho, Chun-Heng
    Eastman, Charles
    Catrambone, Richard
    DESIGN STUDIES, 2006, 27 (04) : 505 - 524
  • [24] 2D or 3D?
    Mills, R
    COMPUTER-AIDED ENGINEERING, 1996, 15 (08): : 4 - 4
  • [25] Investigation of 3D and 2D/3D heterojunction perovskite-based phototransistors
    Yang, Shang
    Li, Juan
    Song, Peixuan
    Guo, Ning
    Liu, Jiaqi
    Ye, Xiaofang
    Cai, Hongkun
    Ni, Jian
    Zhang, Jianjun
    APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 2022, 120 (26)
  • [26] Numerical analysis of sedimentation of a 2D or 3D cold particle
    Maunoury, Aurelie
    Le Bot, Cedric
    Arquis, Eric
    MECHANICS RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2010, 37 (05) : 500 - 503
  • [27] COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D MODELS OF SALINITY NUMERICAL SIMULATION
    Li Chunhui
    Pan Xishan
    Ke Jie
    Dong Xiaotian
    POLISH MARITIME RESEARCH, 2015, 22 : 26 - 29
  • [28] Numerical Solution of 2D and 3D Unsteady Viscous Flows
    Kozel, K.
    Louda, P.
    Prihoda, J.
    NUMERICAL MATHEMATICS AND ADVANCED APPLICATIONS, 2008, : 473 - +
  • [29] Numerical solution of subsonic and transonic flows in 2D and 3D
    Huml, Jaroslav
    Kozel, Karel
    EFM13 - EXPERIMENTAL FLUID MECHANICS 2013, 2014, 67
  • [30] Study on development of 2D and 3D numerical wave tank
    Yan, Shuguang
    Kojima, Haruyuki
    Yamashir, Masaru
    Yoshida, Akinori
    Kim, Sang-Ho
    ASIAN AND PACIFIC COASTS 2007, 2007, : 169 - 172