Clinical evaluation of the ADE scorecards as a decision support tool for adverse drug event analysis and medication safety management

被引:2
作者
Hackl, Werner O. [1 ]
Ammenwerth, Elske [1 ]
Marcilly, Romaric [2 ]
Chazard, Emmanuel [3 ]
Luyckx, Michel [4 ,5 ]
Leurs, Pascale [4 ]
Beuscart, Regis [3 ]
机构
[1] UMIT Univ Hlth Sci Med Informat & Technol, Inst Hlth Informat, A-6060 Hall In Tirol, Austria
[2] Univ Lille Nord France, INSERM CIC IT, CHU Lille, UDSL EA 2694, F-59000 Lille, France
[3] Univ Lille Nord France, Dept Publ Hlth, CHU Lille, UDSL EA 2694, F-59000 Lille, France
[4] Ctr Hosp Denain, Denain, France
[5] Univ Lille Nord France, Fac Sci Pharmaceut & Biol, UDSL2, F-59000 Lille, France
关键词
evaluation studies; medical order entry systems; medication therapy management; patient safety; PHYSICIAN ORDER ENTRY; SYSTEMS; ERRORS; RATES; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/bcp.12185
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
AIMS The prevention of adverse drug events (ADEs) demands co-ordination of different health care professionals. ADE scorecards are a novel approach to raise the team awareness regarding ADE risks and causes. It makes information on numbers and on possible causes of possible ADE cases available to the clinical team. The aim of the study was to investigate the usage and acceptance of ADE scorecards by healthcare professionals and their impact on rates of possible ADEs. METHODS ADE scorecards were introduced in three departments of a French hospital. A controlled time series analysis of ADE data was conducted to assess the impact of the ADE scorecards. In addition, qualitative interviews and a standardized survey with all participating staff members were performed. RESULTS Physicians, nurses and pharmacists found ADE scorecards effective to increase medication safety and recommended future usage. The time-series analysis did not show changes in rates of possible ADEs. CONCLUSION ADE scorecards appear to be useful to raise awareness of ADE-related issues among professionals. Although the evaluation did not show significant reductions of ADE rates, the participating physicians, nurses and pharmacists believed that the ADE scorecards could contribute to increased patient safety and to a reduction in ADE rates. Strategies need to be designed to integrate ADE scorecards better into the clinical routine and to increase the precision of ADE detection.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 90
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of a Clinical Decision Support Rule-set for Medication Adjustments in mHealth-based Heart Failure Management
    Kropf, Martin
    Modre-Osprian, Robert
    Gruber, Katharina
    Fruhwald, Friedrich
    Schreier, Guenter
    EHEALTH2015 - HEALTH INFORMATICS MEETS EHEALTH: INNOVATIVE HEALTH PERSPECTIVES: PERSONALIZED HEALTH, 2015, 212 : 81 - 87
  • [32] Preventability of adverse drug events involving multiple drugs using publicly available clinical decision support tools
    Wright, Adam
    Feblowitz, Joshua
    Phansalkar, Shobha
    Liu, Jialin
    Wilcox, Allison
    Keohane, Carol A.
    Seger, Diane L.
    Bloomrosen, Meryl
    Kuperman, Gilad J.
    Bates, David W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2012, 69 (03) : 221 - 227
  • [33] The Association between Use of a Clinical Decision Support Tool and Adherence to Monitoring for Medication-Laboratory Guidelines in the Ambulatory Setting
    Lau, B.
    Overby, C. L.
    Wirtz, H. S.
    Devine, E. B.
    APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2013, 4 (04): : 476 - 498
  • [34] Assessing the use of a clinical decision support tool for pain management in primary care
    Apathy, Nate C.
    Sanner, Lindsey
    Adams, Meredith C. B.
    Mamlin, Burke W.
    Grout, Randall W.
    Fortin, Saura
    Hillstrom, Jennifer
    Saha, Amit
    Teal, Evgenia
    Vest, Joshua R.
    Menachemi, Nir
    Hurley, Robert W.
    Harle, Christopher A.
    Mazurenko, Olena
    JAMIA OPEN, 2022, 5 (03)
  • [35] Prospective evaluation of medication-related clinical decision support over-rides in the intensive care unit
    Wong, Adrian
    Amato, Mary G.
    Seger, Diane L.
    Rehr, Christine
    Wright, Adam
    Slight, Sarah P.
    Beeler, Patrick E.
    Orav, E. John
    Bates, David W.
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2018, 27 (09) : 718 - 724
  • [36] Evaluation of an Electronic Clinical Decision Support Tool for Incident Elevated BP in Adolescents
    Kharbanda, Elyse Olshen
    Asche, Stephen E.
    Sinaiko, Alan
    Nordin, James D.
    Ekstrom, Heidi L.
    Fontaine, Patricia
    Dehmer, Steven P.
    Sherwood, Nancy E.
    O'Connor, Patrick J.
    ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS, 2018, 18 (01) : 43 - 50
  • [37] Real-time pharmacy surveillance and clinical decision support to reduce adverse drug events in acute kidney injury
    McCoy, A. B.
    Cox, Z. L.
    Neal, E. B.
    Waitman, L. R.
    Peterson, N. B.
    Bhave, G.
    Siew, E. D.
    Danciu, I.
    Lewis, J. B.
    Peterson, J. F.
    APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2012, 3 (02): : 221 - 238
  • [38] Statistically Prioritized and Contextualized Clinical Decision Support Systems, the Future of Adverse Drug Events Prevention?
    Chazard, Emmanuel
    Beuscart, Jean-Baptiste
    Rochoy, Michael
    Dalleur, Olivia
    Decaudin, Bertrand
    Odou, Pascal
    Ficheur, Gregoire
    DIGITAL PERSONALIZED HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2020, 270 : 683 - 687
  • [39] Optimising computerised decision support to transform medication safety and reduce prescriber burden: study protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation of drug-drug interaction alerts
    Baysari, Melissa T.
    Zheng, Wu Yi
    Li, Ling
    Westbrook, Johanna
    Day, Richard O.
    Hilmer, Sarah
    Van Dort, Bethany Annemarie
    Hargreaves, Andrew
    Kennedy, Peter
    Monaghan, Corey
    Doherty, Paula
    Draheim, Michael
    Nair, Lucy
    Samson, Ruby
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (08):
  • [40] Overall performance of a drug-drug interaction clinical decision support system: quantitative evaluation and end-user survey
    van de Sijpe, Greet
    Quintens, Charlotte
    Walgraeve, Karolien
    Van Laer, Eva
    Penny, Jens
    De Vlieger, Greet
    Schrijvers, Rik
    De Munter, Paul
    Foulon, Veerle
    Casteels, Minne
    van der Linden, Lorenz
    Spriet, Isabel
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2022, 22 (01)