Ethical Considerations in On-Ground Applications of the Ecosystem Services Concept

被引:100
作者
Luck, Gary W. [1 ]
Chan, Kai M. A. [2 ]
Eser, Uta [3 ]
Gomez-Baggethun, Erik [4 ,5 ]
Matzdorf, Bettina [6 ]
Norton, Bryan [7 ]
Potschin, Marion B. [8 ]
机构
[1] Charles Sturt Univ, Inst Land Water & Soc, Albury, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ British Columbia, Inst Resources Environm & Sustainabil, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[3] Nurtingen Geislingen Univ, Off Econ & Environm, Nurtingen, Germany
[4] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Germany Inst Environm Sci & Technol, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Ecol, Social Ecol Syst Lab, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Inst Socioecon, Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res, Muncheberg, Germany
[7] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Publ Policy, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[8] Univ Nottingham, Sch Geog, Ctr Environm Management, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
commodification; conservation policy; ecosystem management; environmental ethics; equity; ECONOMIC VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; CONSERVATION; PAYMENTS; BIODIVERSITY; COMMUNITIES; MECHANISMS; CITIZENS; POLICIES; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1525/bio.2012.62.12.4
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The ecosystem services (ES) concept is one of the main avenues for conveying society's dependence on natural ecosystems. On-ground applications of the concept are now widespread and diverse and include its use as a communication tool, for policy guidance and priority setting, and for designing economic instruments for conservation. Each application raises ethical considerations beyond traditional controversies related to the monetary valuation of nature. We review ethical considerations across major on-ground applications and group them into the following categories: anthropocentric framing, economic metaphor, monetary valuation, commodificatian, sociocultural impact, changes in motivations, and equity implications. Different applications of the ES concept raise different suites of ethical issues, and we propose methods to address the issues most relevant to each application. We conclude that the ES concept should be considered as only one among various alternative approaches to valuing nature and that reliance on economic metaphors can exclude other motivations for protecting ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页码:1020 / 1029
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well being synthesis
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, GAIA NEW LOOK LIFE E
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: An Interim Report
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Ecology, Community and Lifestyle: Outline of an Ecosophy
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1987, SCHWERWIEGENDER RECH
[7]   Nonmarket benefits of nature: What should be counted in green GDP? [J].
Boyd, James .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 61 (04) :716-723
[8]  
CALLICOTT JB, 1984, AM PHILOS QUART, V21, P299
[9]   Evaluating land use and livelihood impacts of early forest carbon projects: Lessons for learning about REDD [J].
Caplow, Susan ;
Jagger, Pamela ;
Lawlor, Kathleen ;
Sills, Erin .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2011, 14 (02) :152-167
[10]  
Carter S., 2009, SOCIOECONOMIC BENEFI