Evaluation of the effects of facing stiffness and toe resistance on the behavior of GRS walls

被引:93
作者
Ehrlich, M. [1 ]
Mirmoradi, S. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, COPPE, Dept Civil Engn, BR-21945970 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
关键词
Physical modeling; Numerical modeling; GRS walls; Facing stiffness; Toe resistance; REINFORCED SOIL WALLS; RETAINING WALLS; SEGMENTAL WALLS; DESIGN METHOD; PERFORMANCE; COMPACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.07.012
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This article presents physical and numerical model studies in order to assess the effects of facing stiffness and toe resistance on the behavior of GRS walls. Experimental tests were performed in a facility at the Geotechnical Laboratory of COPPE/UFRJ, using block and wrapped facing types. Tension along the reinforcements and the lateral and vertical movements of the walls were monitored. The results show that for the condition of no toe resistance facing stiffness may not significantly affect the mobilized tension in the reinforcements. Nevertheless, when the base of the face is restricted, varieties of facing stiffness may play an effective role in the magnitude of the tension in the reinforcements. The magnitude of reinforcement tension is not solely associated with facing stiffness, but also to the mobilized friction at the interface of the base of the facing column and foundation soil. Lateral displacements observed in the wrapped-faced wall were much greater than those verified in the block-faced wall, and this may be related to local movements near the face of the walls. Numerical modeling shows that the summation of the maximum tension in the reinforcements and toe load in fixed base condition remained almost constant (less than 5% of variation) and is greater than the value for a free base condition, irrespective of the magnitude of facing stiffness. This difference in the determined values for walls with a free and fixed facing base may be attributed to the lateral movement of the walls, which is more restricted in a fixed base condition. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 36
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] A new working stress method for prediction of reinforcement loads in geosynthetic walls
    Allen, TM
    Bathurst, RJ
    Holtz, RD
    Walters, D
    Lee, WF
    [J]. CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 40 (05) : 976 - 994
  • [2] [Anonymous], NHI07092 FHWA
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges
  • [4] Barboza Junior J.C., 2003, THESIS UFRJ
  • [5] Refinement of K-stiffness Method for geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls
    Bathurst, R. J.
    Miyata, Y.
    Nernheim, A.
    Allen, A. M.
    [J]. GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 15 (04) : 269 - 295
  • [6] Influence of reinforcement stiffness and compaction on the performance of four geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls
    Bathurst, R. J.
    Nernheim, A.
    Walters, D. L.
    Allen, T. M.
    Burgess, P.
    Saunders, D. D.
    [J]. GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 16 (01) : 43 - 59
  • [7] The influence of facing stiffness on the performance of two geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining walls
    Bathurst, Richard J.
    Vlachopoulos, Nicholas
    Walters, Dave L.
    Burgess, Peter G.
    Allen, Tony M.
    [J]. CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 43 (12) : 1225 - 1237
  • [8] Field monitoring evaluation of geotextile-reinforced soil-retaining walls
    Benjamim, C. V. S.
    Bueno, B. S.
    Zornberg, J. G.
    [J]. GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 14 (02) : 100 - 118
  • [9] [Bernardi M. NCMA NCMA], 2009, Design Manual for Segmental Retaining Walls, V3rd
  • [10] BRINKGREVE R.B.J., 2002, PLAXIS FINITE ELEMEN