Analytic hierarchy process to prioritize ecological risk assessment in contaminated sites by oil and derivatives

被引:0
作者
de Souza Filho, Andre Moreira [1 ]
La Rovere, Emilio Lebre [2 ]
Schneider, Marcio Roberto [3 ]
机构
[1] Gerencia Tratamentos Ambientais Residuos & Recurs, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Programa Planejamento Energet, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Nucleo Ressacada Pesquisas Meio Ambiente, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
关键词
analytic hierarchy process; contaminated sites in Brazil; ecological risk assessment; leakage of oil and derivatives;
D O I
10.1590/S1413-415220210250
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) is an important stage in the management of contaminated sites. However, the absence of criteria for the selection of target areas for the application of ERA in Brazil, or the simple adoption of a binary criterion (absence/presence of ecological receptors) is not sufficient for the prioritization of ERA. The definition of prioritization criteria is fundamental in developing countries with great ecological diversity and scarcity of technical and financial resources. In this context, the objective of this study comprised the application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to classify the areas with higher priority of application of ERA, considering the specificities of contamination scenarios. A survey of international criteria for inclusion and exclusion of ERA, the integration of these criteria in the AHP method and the application of the methodology in twelve hydrocarbon-contaminated areas were pursued. The results indicated that the AHP approach has the potential to assist environmental agencies, consultants and stakeholders in the management of contaminated sites to measure and adapt actions to the specificities of each site in a more judicious way, prioritizing the application of available resources for the areas of greater ecological relevance.
引用
收藏
页码:939 / 946
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1998, Federal Register, V63, P26846
  • [2] ASTM, 2014, E2205E2205M2002 ASTM
  • [3] BRASIL, 2012, LEI NO 12 727 OUT 20
  • [4] BRASIL. Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente, 2010, RES NO 428 2010 DISP
  • [5] BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, 2013, PROT 12 CONT SIT SIT
  • [6] Risk assessment of urban soils contamination: The particular case of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
    Cachada, A.
    Ferreira da Silva, E.
    Duarte, A. C.
    Pereira, R.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 551 : 271 - 284
  • [7] CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CALEPA), 1996, GUID EC RISK ASS H B
  • [8] COMPANHIA AMBIENTAL DO ESTADO DE SAO PAULO (CETESB), 2020, P40001 CETESB
  • [9] COMPANHIA AMBIENTAL DO ESTADO DE SAO PAULO (CETESB), 2017, DEC DIR NO 038 2017
  • [10] COMPANHIA AMBIENTAL DO ESTADO DE SAO PAULO (CETESB), 2020, REL AR CONT REAB EST