A short form of the positions on nursing diagnosis scale: development and psychometric testing

被引:8
作者
Manuel Romero-Sanchez, Jose [1 ]
Paloma-Castro, Olga [2 ]
Carlos Paramio-Cuevas, Juan [3 ]
Maria Pastor-Montero, Sonia [4 ]
O'Ferrall-Gonzalez, Cristina [5 ]
Maria Gabaldon-Bravo, Eva [6 ]
Eugenia Gonzalez-Dominguez, Maria [1 ]
Castro-Yuste, Cristina [2 ]
Frandsen, Anna J. [1 ]
Martinez-Sabater, Antonio [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cadiz, Res Grp Andalusian Res Dev & Innovat Scheme CTS 3, Cadiz, Spain
[2] Univ Cadiz, Nursing Fac, Cadiz, Spain
[3] Univ Cadiz, Res Grp Andalusian Res Dev & Innovat Scheme CTS 5, Cadiz, Spain
[4] Hosp Montilla, Cordoba, Spain
[5] Univ Cadiz, Fac Nursing & Physiotherapy, Cadiz, Spain
[6] Univ Alicante, Nursing Fac, E-03080 Alicante, Spain
[7] Univ Valencia, Fac Nursing & Podiatry, Valencia, Spain
关键词
Nursing diagnosis; Students; nursing; Scales; Semantic differential; Psychometrics; RESPONSIVENESS;
D O I
10.1590/S0080-623420130000300010
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
The Positions on Nursing Diagnosis (PND) is a scale that uses the semantic differential technique to measure nurses' attitudes towards the nursing diagnosis concept. The aim of this study was to develop a shortened form of the Spanish version of this scale and evaluate its psychometric properties and efficiency. A double theoretical-empirical approach was used to obtain a short form of the PND, the PND-7-SV, which would be equivalent to the original. Using a cross-sectional survey design, the reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability), construct (exploratory factor analysis, known-groups technique and discriminant validity) and criterion-related validity (concurrent validity), sensitivity to change and efficiency of the PND-7-SV were assessed in a sample of 476 Spanish nursing students. The results endorsed the utility of the PND-7-SV to measure attitudes toward nursing diagnosis in an equivalent manner to the complete form of the scale and in a shorter time.
引用
收藏
页码:590 / 597
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1974, STAT MED
[2]  
Cruz D. A. L. M., 2006, REV BRAS ENFERM, V59, P163, DOI DOI 10.1590/S0034-71672006000200008
[3]   Reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures - Theoretical considerations illustrated by an empirical example [J].
de Vet, HCW ;
Bouter, LM ;
Bezemer, PD ;
Beurskens, AJHM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2001, 17 (04) :479-487
[4]  
Dillman D.A., 1978, MAIL TELEPHONE SURVE
[5]   EFFECTS OF QUESTIONNAIRE LENGTH, RESPONDENT-FRIENDLY DESIGN, AND A DIFFICULT QUESTION ON RESPONSE RATES FOR OCCUPANT-ADDRESSED CENSUS MAIL SURVEYS [J].
DILLMAN, DA ;
SINCLAIR, MD ;
CLARK, JR .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1993, 57 (03) :289-304
[6]  
Espana. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, 2008, BOLOFICIALESTADO
[7]  
Fishbein M., 1967, Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement
[8]   Online data collection: Strategies for research [J].
Granello, DH ;
Wheaton, JE .
JOURNAL OF COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 82 (04) :387-393
[9]  
Hair FJ., 1998, Multivariate Data Analysis (Fifth ed.)
[10]   A joint latent variable model approach to item reduction and validation [J].
Halberstadt, Steffanie M. ;
Schmitz, Kathryn H. ;
Sammel, Mary D. .
BIOSTATISTICS, 2012, 13 (01) :48-60