An integrated method for multi-criteria decision-making based on the best-worst method and Dempster-Shafer evidence theory under double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic environment

被引:23
作者
Zhang, Ruichen [1 ]
Xu, Zeshui [1 ]
Gou, Xunjie [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610064, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set; Dempster-Shafer evidence theory; Best-worst method; Multi-criteria decision-making; Weight-determination method; TERM SETS; AGGREGATION OPERATORS; REPRESENTATION MODEL; SIMILARITY MEASURES; REASONING APPROACH; FRAMEWORK; PROBABILITIES;
D O I
10.1007/s10489-020-01777-2
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set (DHHFLTS) is a newly developed complex linguistic expression model, and has been well applied to multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems. However, the determination of criteria weights and the innovation of decision-making methods are still two issues that worth exploring in this field. At present, conventional weight-determination methods sometimes have the disadvantages of complicated calculation and low consistency of the obtained results. On the other hand, the existing methods for linguistic information sometimes cannot consider the uncertainty of information caused by ignorance. Considering that the best-worst method (BWM) is a weight-determination method, which can not only greatly simplify the calculation process, but also improve the consistency degree of the results. Dempster-Shafer evidence theory (DSET) can better deal with information uncertainty caused by ignorance. Therefore, this paper extends the BWM and DSET to double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic environment to solve the above two problems respectively, and the DHHFL-BWM-DSET method is proposed. First, the weight of each criterion is derived based on the BWM-based weight-determination method. Then, inspired by DSET, we propose a DSET-based MCDM method which can not only obtain the decision results of a single decision maker, but also integrate the decision information of multiple decision makers to obtain more rational results. Therefore, decision makers can choose the method based on the specific situation. Finally, taking the selection of financial products as an example, it shows that the method proposed in this paper has some breakthroughs and advantages.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 735
页数:23
相关论文
共 54 条
[41]   Hesitant Fuzzy Sets [J].
Torra, Vicenc .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2010, 25 (06) :529-539
[42]   Type 2 representation and reasoning for CWW [J].
Türksen, IB .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2002, 127 (01) :17-36
[43]   Extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their aggregation in group decision making [J].
Wang, Hai .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2015, 8 (01) :14-33
[44]   A new version of 2-tuple. fuzzy linguistic, representation model for computing with words [J].
Wang, JH ;
Hao, JY .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2006, 14 (03) :435-445
[45]   Assessment of traffic congestion with ORESTE method under double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic environment [J].
Wang, Xindi ;
Gou, Xunjie ;
Xu, Zeshui .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 86
[46]   Nested probabilistic-numerical linguistic term sets in two-stage multi-attribute group decision making [J].
Wang, Xinxin ;
Xu, Zeshui ;
Gou, Xunjie .
APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 49 (07) :2582-2602
[47]   Some hybrid aggregating operators in linguistic decision making with Dempster-Shafer belief structure [J].
Wei, Gui-Wu ;
Zhao, Xiaofei ;
Lin, Rui .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 65 (04) :646-651
[48]   Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets [J].
Xu, Zeshui ;
Xia, Meimei .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2011, 181 (11) :2128-2138
[49]   GENERALIZED PROBABILITIES OF FUZZY EVENTS FROM FUZZY BELIEF STRUCTURES [J].
YAGER, RR .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 1982, 28 (01) :45-62
[50]   The evidential reasoning approach for MADA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties [J].
Yang, JB ;
Wang, YM ;
Xu, DL ;
Chin, KS .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 171 (01) :309-343