Relevant social groups for open data use and engagement

被引:32
作者
Lassinantti, Josefin [1 ]
Stahlbrost, Anna [1 ]
Runardotter, Mari [1 ]
机构
[1] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Comp Sci Elect & Space Engn, S-97187 Lulea, Sweden
基金
欧盟第七框架计划;
关键词
Open data; Re-use; PSI-directive; Social shaping of technology; Relevant social groups; OPEN GOVERNMENT DATA; TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE; CONSTRUCTION; TRANSPARENCY; CHALLENGES; BARRIERS; COMPLEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.giq.2018.11.001
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The opening up of public sector data has provided a new data resource for the citizens. However, the use of open data and its consequent societal value has proved not to be as extensive as initially hoped for, although multiple innovations have emerged; rather it is still considered problematic, and knowledge about open data use is scarce. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to clarify open data use and engagement by people outside the public sector, especially what motives exists and how different user types align to these motives. To achieve this, a document analysis has been carried out of reported use cases identified in EU topic reports between 2014 and 2016. By applying the theory of Relevant Social Groups (RSG), which focuses on the peoples interpretation of the purpose with the technology, we identified five RSGs representing overall motives for open data use: 1) Exploring for creativity, 2) Creating business value, 3) Enabling local citizen value, 4) Addressing global societal challenges, and 5) Advocating the open data agenda. We also discuss differences between the relevant social groups and the included user types, issues and implications for understanding the evolvement of the open data field, and suggests research ahead.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 111
页数:14
相关论文
共 138 条
[91]  
Kronenburg T, 2011, STATE PLAY PSI REUSE
[92]  
Kronenburg T, 2011, DATA JOURNALISM FUEL
[93]  
Kronenburg T, 2011, DIFFERENCES 2008 201
[94]  
Krotoski A. K, 2012, UKSG INSIGHTS, V24
[95]  
Lassinantti J, 2013, 6 ISPIM INN S, P1
[96]   Towards open development: Leveraging open data to improve the planning and coordination of international aid [J].
Linders, Dennis .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2013, 30 (04) :426-434
[97]   Social construction of stormwater control measures in Melbourne and Copenhagen: A discourse analysis of technological change, embedded meanings and potential mainstreaming [J].
Madsen, Herle Mo ;
Brown, Rebekah ;
Elle, Morten ;
Mikkelsen, Peter Steen .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2017, 115 :198-209
[98]  
Manolea B., 2013, INFLUENCE OPEN GOVT
[99]   The Internet and Transparency [J].
Margetts, Helen .
POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 2011, 82 (04) :518-521
[100]   The Illusion of Transparency [J].
Marsh, Kevin .
POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 2011, 82 (04) :531-535