How Large-Scale Research Facilities Connect to Global Research

被引:25
作者
Lauto, Giancarlo [1 ,2 ]
Valentin, Finn [1 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Business Sch, Res Ctr Biotech Business, Frederiksberg, Denmark
[2] Univ Udine, Dept Econ & Stat, I-33100 Udine, Italy
关键词
international research collaboration; big science; basic research; science policy; proximity; RESEARCH COLLABORATION; SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION; INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION; INSTITUTIONAL PERSISTENCE; SELF-ORGANIZATION; TEAM DIVERSITY; BIG-SCIENCE; KNOWLEDGE; NETWORKS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/ropr.12027
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Policies for large-scale research facilities (LSRFs) often highlight their spillovers to industrial innovation and their contribution to the external connectivity of the regional innovation system hosting them. Arguably, the particular institutional features of LSRFs are conducive for collaborative research. However, based on data on publications produced in 2006-2009 at the Neutron Science Directorate of Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee (United States), we find that internationalization of its collaborative research is restrained by coordination costs similar to those characterizing other institutional settings. Policies mandating LSRFs should consider that research prioritized on the basis of technological relevance limits the international reach of collaborations. Additionally, the propensity for international collaboration is lower for resident scientists than for those affiliated with domestic universities or government laboratories. Policies conceiving LSRFs as knowledge attractors therefore should consider the complementarities between research at a LSRF and in its academic context at a regional or national level.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 408
页数:28
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Evolutionary dynamics of scientific collaboration networks: multi-levels and cross-time analysis [J].
Abbasi, Alireza ;
Hossain, Liaquat ;
Uddin, Shahadat ;
Rasmussen, Kim J. R. .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2011, 89 (02) :687-710
[2]   Research collaboration and productivity: is there correlation? [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea ;
Di Costa, Flavia .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2009, 57 (02) :155-171
[3]   Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from US universities, 1981-1999 [J].
Adams, JD ;
Black, GC ;
Clemmons, JR ;
Stephan, PE .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (03) :259-285
[4]   Framing prospects and risk in the public promotion of ESS Scandinavia [J].
Agrell, Wilhelm .
SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2012, 39 (04) :429-438
[5]  
Arundel A., 2004, ECON INNOV NEW TECH, V13, P559, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1043859092000234311, 10.1080/1043859092000234311]
[6]   Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Bases [J].
Asheim, Bjorn T. ;
Boschma, Ron ;
Cooke, Philip .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2011, 45 (07) :893-904
[7]   A framework of industrial knowledge spillovers in big-science centers [J].
Autio, E ;
Hameri, AP ;
Vuola, O .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2004, 33 (01) :107-126
[8]   Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation [J].
Bathelt, H ;
Malmberg, A ;
Maskell, P .
PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2004, 28 (01) :31-56
[9]   The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams: Composition, social networks, and geography [J].
Bercovitz, Janet ;
Feldman, Maryann .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (01) :81-93
[10]   Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research [J].
Bordons, M ;
Gomez, I ;
Fernandez, MT ;
Zulueta, MA ;
Mendez, A .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1996, 37 (02) :279-295