Oncologic outcomes of intersphincteric resection without preoperative chemoradiotherapy for very low rectal cancer

被引:34
作者
Akagi, Yoshito [1 ]
Shirouzu, Kazuo [1 ]
Ogata, Yutaka [1 ]
Kinugasa, Tetsushi [1 ]
机构
[1] Kurume Univ, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Kurume, Fukuoka 8300011, Japan
来源
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD | 2013年 / 22卷 / 02期
关键词
Intersphincteric resection; Rectal cancer; Survival; Local recurrence; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; SPHINCTER-SAVING RESECTION; ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; IRRADIATED PATIENTS; LOWER; 3RD; CARCINOMA; SURGERY; MARGIN; PRESERVATION; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.suronc.2013.03.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: When a rectal cancer is located at less than 4 cm from the anal verge, abdominoperineal resection (APR) is generally performed. If an ideal surgery that could replace APR were to be developed, it could contribute to anal preservation in patients with very low rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate oncologically whether intersphincteric resection (ISR) could replace APR for a very low rectal cancer. Methods: Between 2001 and 2011, ISR was curatively performed in 124 patients with a very low rectal cancer who might otherwise have been treated with APR. No patient received preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The median duration of follow-up was 65 months (range 14-122 months). Local recurrence was defined as only intra-pelvic recurrences including lateral lymph node metastasis. The survival rate was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Postoperative morbidity including anastomotic leakage (5.6%) was 12%. There was no in-hospital mortality. In those patients with Stages I, II, and III disease, the local recurrence rate was 4.7%, 4.9%, and 5.0%, respectively. The recurrence-free 5-year survival rates were 92.2% (95% CI: 84-100%), 81.9% (95% CI: 70-94%) and 69.6% (95% CI: 53-87%) at each stage, respectively. The cancer-specific 5-year survival rates were 90.5% (95% CI: 81-100%), 91.0% (95% CI: 82-100%), and 83.6% (95% CI: 70-97%) at each stage, respectively. The overall recurrence-free survival and local recurrence rates after ISR were similar to those after APR. Conclusions: The ISR procedure appears to be oncologically acceptable, replacing APR in selected patients. Accumulated experience supports this practice worldwide in future. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 149
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery
    Beets-Tan, RGH
    Beets, GL
    Vliegen, RFA
    Kessels, AGH
    Van Boven, H
    De Bruine, A
    von Meyenfeldt, MF
    Baeten, CGMI
    van Engelshoven, JMA
    [J]. LANCET, 2001, 357 (9255) : 497 - 504
  • [2] Preoperative radiotherapy for resectable rectal cancer -: A meta-analysis
    Cammà, C
    Giunta, M
    Fiorica, F
    Pagliaro, L
    Craxì, A
    Cottone, M
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 284 (08): : 1008 - 1015
  • [3] Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer
    Chamlou, Reza
    Parc, Yann
    Simon, Tabassome
    Bennis, Malika
    Dehni, Nidal
    Parc, Rolland
    Tiret, Emmanuel
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 246 (06) : 916 - 922
  • [4] Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey
    Dindo, D
    Demartines, N
    Clavien, PA
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) : 205 - 213
  • [5] Anal inspection and digital rectal examination compared to anorectal physiology tests and endoanal ultrasonography in evaluating fecal incontinence
    Dobben, Annette C.
    Terra, Maaike P.
    Deutekom, Marije
    Gerhards, Michael F.
    Bijnen, A. Bart
    Felt-Bersma, Richelle J. F.
    Janssen, Lucas W. M.
    Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
    Stoker, Jaap
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2007, 22 (07) : 783 - 790
  • [6] Local recurrence in rectal cancer can be predicted by histopathological factors
    Dresen, R. C.
    Peters, E. E. M.
    Rutten, H. J. T.
    Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A. P.
    Demeyere, T. B. J.
    van den Brule, A. J. C.
    Kessels, A. G. H.
    Beets-Tan, R. G. H.
    van Krieken, J. H. J. M.
    Nagtegaal, I. D.
    [J]. EJSO, 2009, 35 (10): : 1071 - 1077
  • [7] HEALD RJ, 1986, LANCET, V1, P1479
  • [8] The influence of abdomino-peranal (intersphincteric) resection of lower third rectal carcinoma on the rates of sphincter preservation and locoregional recurrence
    Hohenberger, W
    Merkel, S
    Matzel, K
    Bittorf, B
    Papaclopoulos, T
    Göhl, J
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2006, 8 (01) : 23 - 33
  • [9] Analysis of Clinical Factors Associated with Anal Function after Intersphincteric Resection for Very Low Rectal Cancer
    Ito, Masaaki
    Saito, Norio
    Sugito, Masanori
    Kobayashi, Akihiro
    Nishizawa, Yusuke
    Tsunoda, Yoshiyuki
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2009, 52 (01) : 64 - 70
  • [10] The Digital Rectal Examination Scoring System (DRESS)
    Orkin, Bruce A.
    Sinykin, Svetlana B.
    Lloyd, Patricia C.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2010, 53 (12) : 1656 - 1660