What Factors Are Associated With Functional Sensory Recovery Following Lingual Nerve Repair?

被引:21
作者
Fagin, Adam P. [1 ]
Susarla, Srinivas M.
Donoff, Robert B. [1 ]
Kaban, Leonard B. [1 ]
Dodson, Thomas B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Dent Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE; MANDIBULAR 3RD MOLARS; MANAGEMENT; REMOVAL; MICROSURGERY; INJURIES; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2012.03.019
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To identify factors associated with functional sensory recovery (FSR) after lingual nerve repair. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study was composed of subjects who underwent lingual nerve repair from 2004 through 2010. The predictor variables were demographic, anatomic, and operative measurements. The primary outcome measurement was FSR (ie, FSR achieved, yes or no). The secondary outcome measurements were time to FSR and an improvement of at least 2 levels on the British Medical Research Council scale of neurosensory function. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression statistics were computed to identify associations between the predictor variables and FSR. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify associations between the predictors and time to FSR. P <= .05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The sample was composed of 55 subjects with a mean age of 30.7 +/- 11.2 years. The mean duration from injury to repair was 151.6 days (range, 41 to 384 days). Most patients (74.5%) achieved FSR postoperatively, with a mean time to FSR of 262.8 days (median, 208 days). Eighty-six percent of subjects showed an improvement of at least 2 levels on the British Medical Research Council scale. In multiple regression models, younger subjects were more likely to achieve FSR (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.18; P = .02); subjects with better preoperative neurosensory function achieved FSR faster (hazard ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 3.1; P = .01). Conclusion: Most patients undergoing lingual nerve repair achieved FSR. Younger subjects were more likely to achieve FSR. Subjects with better preoperative neurosensory function achieved FSR faster. (c) 2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:2907-2915, 2012
引用
收藏
页码:2907 / 2915
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[11]   MICROSURGICAL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE LINGUAL NERVE [J].
MOZSARY, PG ;
MIDDLETON, RA .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1984, 42 (07) :415-420
[12]   The results of microneurosurgery of the inferior alveolar and lingual nerve [J].
Pogrel, MA .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 60 (05) :485-489
[13]   A study on the efficacy of late lingual nerve repair [J].
Robinson, PP ;
Smith, KG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 34 (01) :96-103
[14]   Current management of damage to the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves as a result of removal of third molars [J].
Robinson, PP ;
Loescher, AR ;
Yates, JM ;
Smith, KG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 42 (04) :285-292
[15]   A prospective, quantitative study on the clinical outcome of lingual nerve repair [J].
Robinson, PP ;
Loescher, AR ;
Smith, KG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2000, 38 (04) :255-263
[16]   Long-term outcome assessment for lingual nerve microsurgery [J].
Rutner, TW ;
Ziccardi, VB ;
Janal, MN .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 63 (08) :1145-1149
[17]   Does early repair of lingual nerve injuries improve functional sensory recovery? [J].
Susarla, Srinivas M. ;
Kaban, Leonard B. ;
Donoff, R. Bruce ;
Dodson, Thomas B. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 65 (06) :1070-1076
[18]   Functional sensory recovery after trigeminal nerve repair [J].
Susarla, Srinivas M. ;
Kaban, Leonard B. ;
Donoff, R. Bruce ;
Dodson, Thomas B. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 65 (01) :60-65
[19]   Effects of age, amount of advancement, and genioplasty on neurosensory disturbance after a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy [J].
Van Sickels, JE ;
Hatch, JP ;
Dolce, C ;
Bays, RA ;
Rugh, JD .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 60 (09) :1012-1017
[20]  
Ziccardi VB, 2009, QUINTESSENCE INT, V40, P295