A multicenter randomized comparison of the Endocapsule and the Pillcam SB

被引:91
作者
Cave, David R. [1 ]
Fleischer, David E. [2 ,4 ]
Leighton, Jonathan A. [2 ]
Faigel, Douglas O.
Heigh, Russell I. [2 ]
Sharma, Virender K. [2 ]
Gostout, Christolher J. [3 ]
Rajan, Elizabeth [2 ]
Mergener, Klaus [5 ]
Foley, Anne [1 ]
Lee, Michael [2 ]
Bhattacharya, Kanishka [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Mem Med Ctr, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[5] Digest Dis Specialists, Tacoma, WA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2007.12.037
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Video capsule endoscopy has been shown to be the single most effective endoscopic procedure for identifying the source of obscure GI bleeding (OGIB). Objective: Our purpose was to report on the Food and Drug Administration pivotal trial in which the Endocapsule (EC) (Olympus America, Allentown, Pa) was compared with the Pillcam SB (PSB) (Given Imaging, Yoqneam, Israel) in patients with OGIB. Design: A novel trial design Was used in which the EC and the PSB were swallowed by the same patient 40 minutes apart, in randomized order. Setting: Four academic medical centers. Patients: Patients with OGIB aged 18 to 85 years who had either been transfused or who had a hematocrit of < 31% in males or < 28% in females. Interventions: Both video capsules were swallowed in random order. Videos from the PSB were read locally for patient management. All videos were then read by at least 2 independent readers for normal versus abnormal categorization, a diagnosis, capsule transit time, reading time, and a subjective assessment of image quality. Main Outcome Measurement: Categorization of videos as either normal or abnormal. Results: Data from 51 of 63 enrolled Patients Were analyzed. Nine patients were excluded for technical reasons and 3 for protocol violations. Twenty-four videos were read is normal and 14 as abnormal from both capsules. Disagreement occurred in 13. No adverse events were reported for either capsule. Overall agreement was 38 of 51 (74.5%) with a kappa of 0.48, P = .008. Limitations: Although ingestion order was randomized, the videos could not be read blind owing to 21 different shape of the image margin. Conclusions: (1) Both devices were safe and had a comparable diagnostic yield within the range previously reported. (2) There was a subjective difference in image quality favoring the K. (3) This study design provided unique information about capsule movement in the small intestine and the lack of electromechanical interference between 2 different capsules.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 494
页数:8
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] A randomized trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy for the detection of small-bowel lesions
    Appleyard, M
    Fireman, Z
    Glukhovsky, A
    Jacob, H
    Shreiver, R
    Kadirkamanathan, S
    Lavy, A
    Lewkowicz, S
    Scapa, E
    Shofti, R
    Swain, P
    Zaretsky, A
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 119 (06) : 1431 - 1438
  • [2] Capsule endoscopy or push enteroscopy for first-line exploration of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding?
    De Leusse, Antoine
    Vahedi, Kouroche
    Edery, Joel
    Tiah, Djamel
    Fery-Lemonnier, Elisabeth
    Cellier, Christophe
    Bouhnik, Yoram
    Jian, Raymond
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 132 (03) : 855 - 862
  • [3] Estévez E, 2006, EUR J GASTROEN HEPAT, V18, P881
  • [4] Diagnostic yield and effect on clinical outcomes of push enteroscopy in suspected small-bowel bleeding
    Hayat, M
    Axon, ATR
    O'Mahony, S
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 32 (05) : 369 - 372
  • [5] Variation in diagnostic yield of back-to-back capsule endoscopy in obscure GI bleeding: Final results
    Kimble, Jennifer S.
    Chak, Amitabh
    Isenberg, Gerard A.
    Cooper, Gregory S.
    Wong, Richard C.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 65 (05) : AB185 - AB185
  • [6] Capsule Endoscopy Structured Terminology (CEST): Proposal of a standardized and structured terminology for reporting capsule endoscopy procedures
    Korman, LY
    Delvaux, M
    Gay, G
    Hagenmuller, F
    Keuchel, M
    Friedman, S
    Weinstein, M
    Shetzline, M
    Cave, D
    de Franchis, R
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 37 (10) : 951 - 959
  • [7] APPLICATION OF HIERARCHICAL KAPPA-TYPE STATISTICS IN ASSESSMENT OF MAJORITY AGREEMENT AMONG MULTIPLE OBSERVERS
    LANDIS, JR
    KOCH, GG
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (02) : 363 - 374
  • [8] Capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of patients with suspected small intestinal bleeding: results of a pilot study
    Lewis, BS
    Swain, P
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (03) : 349 - 353
  • [9] Outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy: Report of 100 consecutive cases
    Pennazio, M
    Santucci, R
    Rondonotti, E
    Abbiati, C
    Beccari, G
    Rossini, FP
    de Franchis, R
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 126 (03) : 643 - 653
  • [10] A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding
    Triester, SL
    Leighton, JA
    Leontiadis, GI
    Fleischer, DE
    Hara, AK
    Heigh, RI
    Shiff, AD
    Sharma, VK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 100 (11) : 2407 - 2418