Nonadaptive radiation: Pervasive diet specialization by drift in scale insects?

被引:32
作者
Hardy, Nate B. [1 ]
Peterson, Daniel A. [2 ]
Normark, Benjamin B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Dept Entomol & Plant Pathol, 301 Funchess Hall, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Biol, Grad Program Organism & Evolutionary Biol, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
关键词
Comparative analysis; diversification; extinction; host range; insect-plant interactions; niche breadth; speciation; HOST-PLANT UTILIZATION; PHYTOPHAGOUS INSECTS; TRANSITION RATES; TRADE-OFFS; DIVERSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; SPECIATION; BUTTERFLIES; PHYLOGENIES; TRAITS;
D O I
10.1111/evo.13036
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
At least half of metazoan species are herbivorous insects. Why are they so diverse? Most herbivorous insects feed on few plant species, and adaptive host specialization is often invoked to explain their diversification. Nevertheless, it is possible that the narrow host ranges of many herbivorous insects are nonadaptive. Here, we test predictions of this hypothesis with comparative phylogenetic analyses of scale insects, a group for which there appear to be few host-use trade-offs that would select against polyphagy, and for which passive wind-dispersal should make host specificity costly. We infer a strong positive relationship between host range and diversification rate, and a marked asymmetry in cladogenetic changes in diet breadth. These results are consonant with a system of pervasive nonadaptive host specialization in which small, drift-and extinction-prone populations are frequently isolated from persistent and polyphagous source populations. They also contrast with the negative relationship between diet breadth and taxonomic diversification that has been estimated in butterflies, a disparity that likely stems from differences in the average costs and benefits of host specificity and generalism in scale insects versus butterflies. Our results indicate the potential for nonadaptive processes to be important to diet-breadth evolution and taxonomic diversification across herbivorous insects.
引用
收藏
页码:2421 / 2428
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Abouheif E, 1999, EVOL ECOL RES, V1, P895
[2]   Resource specialization in a phytophagous insect: no evidence for genetically based performance trade-offs across hosts in the field or laboratory [J].
Agosta, S. J. ;
Klemens, J. A. .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2009, 22 (04) :907-912
[3]  
[Anonymous], EVOLUTION MODERN SYN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1992, BAYESIAN STAT
[6]   Speciation by symbiosis [J].
Brucker, Robert M. ;
Bordenstein, Seth R. .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2012, 27 (08) :443-451
[7]  
Cope E.D., 1896, The Primary Factors of Organic Evolution', DOI DOI 10.5962/BHL.TITLE.2068
[8]   Conflictual speciation: species formation via genomic conflict [J].
Crespi, Bernard ;
Nosil, Patrik .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2013, 28 (01) :48-57
[9]   Is specialization an evolutionary dead end? Testing for differences in speciation, extinction and trait transition rates across diverse phylogenies of specialists and generalists [J].
Day, E. H. ;
Hua, X. ;
Bromham, L. .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2016, 29 (06) :1257-1267
[10]   WHY THERE ARE SO FEW SPECIES OF APHIDS, ESPECIALLY IN THE TROPICS [J].
DIXON, AFG ;
KINDLMANN, P ;
LEPS, J ;
HOLMAN, J .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1987, 129 (04) :580-592