Development and psychometric properties of the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire - physician version (SDM-Q-Doc)

被引：196

作者：

Scholl, Isabelle ^{[1
]}

Kriston, Levente ^{[1
]}

Dirmaier, Joerg ^{[1
]}

Buchholz, Angela ^{[1
]}

Haerter, Martin ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Med Psychol, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany

来源：

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING | 2012年 / 88卷 / 02期

关键词：

Shared decision-making; Patient involvement; Questionnaires; Physicians' perspective; Psychometrics; OPTION SCALE; VALIDATION;

D O I：

10.1016/j.pec.2012.03.005

中图分类号：

R1 [预防医学、卫生学];

学科分类号：

1004 ; 120402 ;

摘要：

Objective: To develop and psychometrically test a brief instrument for assessing the physician's perspective of the shared decision-making process in clinical encounters. Methods: We adapted the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) for patients to generate a new version for physicians (SDM-Q-Doc). The physician version was tested in clinical encounters between 29 physicians and 324 patients in German outpatient care contexts. Analyses of the extent to which the instrument was accepted, the reliability of the instrument, and the factorial structure of the scale were performed. Results: Physicians showed a high level of acceptance toward the SDM-Q-Doc. Item discrimination parameters were above .4 for all but one item. An analysis of internal consistency yielded a Cronbach's alpha of .88. Factor analysis confirmed a one-dimensional structure. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that the SDM-Q-Doc is a well-accepted and reliable instrument for assessing the physician's perspective during SDM processes in clinical encounters. To our knowledge, the SDM-Q-Doc is the first psychometrically tested scale available for assessing the physician's perspective. Practice implications: The SDM-Q-Doc can be used in studies that analyze the effectiveness of the implementation of SDM and as a quality indicator in quality assurance programs and health service assessments. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：284 / 290

页数：7

共 29 条

[1]

Ajzen I., 1980, Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior

[2]

[Anonymous], 2009, Multivariate data analysis

[3]

Behrend L, 2010, HLTH EXPECT, DOI [10.1111/j.369-7625.2010.00614.x, DOI 10.1111/J.369-7625.2010.00614.X]

[4] Informed decision making in outpatient practice - Time to get back to basics [J].

Braddock, CH ;

Edwards, KA ;

Hasenberg, NM ;

Laidley, TL ;

Levinson, W .

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (24) :2313-2320

[5] The Emerging Importance and Relevance of Shared Decision Making to Clinical Practice [J].

Braddock, Clarence H., III .

MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2010, 30 :5S-7S

[6] Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango) [J].

Charles, C ;

Gafni, A ;

Whelan, T .

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (05) :681-692

[7] Instruments for evaluating shared medical decision making - A structured literature review [J].

Dy, Sydney Morss .

MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2007, 64 (06) :623-649

[8]

Elwyn G, 2000, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V50, P892

[9] The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks [J].

Elwyn, G ;

Hutchings, H ;

Edwards, A ;

Rapport, F ;

Wensing, M ;

Cheung, WY ;

Grol, R .

HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2005, 8 (01) :34-42

[10]

Giersdorf N, 2004, Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz, V47, P969

← 1 2 3 →