Using Programme Theory to evaluate Lean interventions in healthcare

被引:5
作者
Lindsay, Claire F. [1 ]
Aitken, James [2 ]
机构
[1] Heriot Watt Univ, Sch Social Sci, Edinburgh Business Sch, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Surrey, Dept Business Transformat, Guildford, Surrey, England
关键词
Lean; healthcare; Programme Theory; evaluation; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; OPERATIONS; IMPLEMENTATION; INITIATIVES; LESSONS; SYSTEM; METHODOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; IMPROVEMENT; CULTURE;
D O I
10.1080/09537287.2022.2139778
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Lean in healthcare has continued to attract practitioner and research interest over the past two decades yet lacks evidence of sustained application. This longitudinal case study examines Lean healthcare interventions through the lens of Programme Theory, to provide an understanding of the design and implementation of a Lean programme. Through a qualitative single case study of an NHS organisation implementing Lean, content analysis of 70 reports from a 6-year period was undertaken and supported by interview data from 12 respondents involved in Lean initiatives. Through Programme Theory, we identify contextual moderators, internal and external, informing the design and development of Lean efforts. The key to successful and sustained Lean efforts is staff acceptance of the Programme Theory for delivering and maintaining outcomes. This has been identified as a key social determinant for Lean sustainability. Results from the research provide practical implications for designing a programme that accommodates resource challenges while incorporating multiple contextual drivers. The case study highlights an organisation's Lean journey and the best practices that evolved; however, further longitudinal investigations are required to validate the findings.
引用
收藏
页码:824 / 841
页数:18
相关论文
共 93 条
  • [71] Designing quality improvement initiatives: the action effect method, a structured approach to identifying and articulating programme theory
    Reed, Julie E.
    McNicholas, Christopher
    Woodcock, Thomas
    Issen, Laurel
    Bell, Derek
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2014, 23 (12) : 1040 - 1048
  • [72] Exploring the barriers and facilitators of psychological safety in primary care teams: a qualitative study
    Remtulla, Ridhaa
    Hagana, Arwa
    Houbby, Nour
    Ruparell, Kajal
    Aojula, Nivaran
    Menon, Anannya
    Thavarajasingam, Santhosh G.
    Meyer, Edgar
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [73] Does lean cure variability in health care?
    Roemeling, Oskar
    Land, Martin
    Ahaus, Kees
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2017, 37 (09) : 1229 - 1245
  • [74] Rogers P., 2013, EVALUATION-US, V14, P29, DOI DOI 10.1177/1356389007084674
  • [75] How did the publication of the book The Machine That Changed The World change management thinking? Exploring 25 years of lean literature
    Samuel, Donna
    Found, Pauline
    Williams, Sharon J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2015, 35 (10) : 1386 - 1407
  • [76] Reporting and Justifying the Number of Interview Participants in Organization and Workplace Research
    Saunders, Mark N. K.
    Townsend, Keith
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2016, 27 (04) : 836 - 852
  • [77] The Pursuit of Productivity
    Schmenner, Roger W.
    [J]. PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2015, 24 (02) : 341 - 350
  • [78] Sharp G., 2011, American International Journal of Contemporary Research, V1, P72
  • [80] Health Care Supply Chain Design: Toward Linking the Development and Delivery of Care Globally
    Sinha, Kingshuk K.
    Kohnke, Emily J.
    [J]. DECISION SCIENCES, 2009, 40 (02) : 197 - 212