Marine ecotoxic effect of pulse emissions in life cycle impact assessment

被引:0
作者
Pettersen, J [1 ]
Peters, GP
Hertwich, EG
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Ind Ecol Programme, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Energy & Proc Engn, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
ecotoxicity; fate; life cycle impact assessment; pulse; transient;
D O I
10.1897/04-510R.1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Characterization factors for ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment are traditionally calculated as the product of effect and fate factors. Steady-state multiple compartment models are used to calculate the fate factor, while effect factors are derived from species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) for multiple substances using average or marginal gradients. Others have shown that steady-state multicompartment models can be used to calculate characterization factors if linear dose-response functions are used. Average gradients are linear dose-response functions per definition. Marginal gradients are first-order Taylor approximations of the effect function and require marginal exposure at all points of the compartment. Instantaneous mixing, giving marginal exposure within compartments, is an implicit assumption of the multicompartment model. This paper investigates if the assumption of marginal exposure results in significant errors for the characterization factor. Ecotoxic effect of pulse emissions is simulated in a transient three-dimensional single compartment model of the marine aquatic environment. Results show that the error in characterization factors for the Taylor approximation is less than a factor of two for multisubstance SSDs assuming concentration addition only in the aggregation of toxic effect of substances. Assuming a combination of response and concentration addition may result in a deviation of several orders of magnitude.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 303
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Choice of land reference situation in life cycle impact assessment
    Viêt Cao
    Manuele Margni
    Basil D. Favis
    Louise Deschênes
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 1220 - 1231
  • [32] Life cycle impact assessment of pollutants causing aquatic eutrophication
    Huijbregts, MAJ
    Seppälä, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2001, 6 (06) : 339 - 343
  • [33] On the meaning of fuzzy approach and normalisation in life cycle impact assessment
    Finnish Environment Institute , Helsinki, Finland
    Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 2007, 7 (464-469): : 464 - 469
  • [34] Choice of land reference situation in life cycle impact assessment
    Cao, Viet
    Margni, Manuele
    Favis, Basil D.
    Deschenes, Louise
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (08) : 1220 - 1231
  • [36] Impact of maintenance on life cycle impact and cost assessment for residential flooring options
    Elizabeth Minne
    John C. Crittenden
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2015, 20 : 36 - 45
  • [37] Predicted Environmental Impact and Expected Occurrence of Actual Environmental Impact Part I: The Linear Nature of Environmental Impact from Emissions in Life-Cycle Assessment
    Potting, Jose
    Hauschild, Michael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 1997, 2 (03) : 171 - 177
  • [38] Impact of maintenance on life cycle impact and cost assessment for residential flooring options
    Minne, Elizabeth
    Crittenden, John C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (01) : 36 - 45
  • [39] Business strategy for sustainable development: Impact of life cycle inventory and life cycle impact assessment steps in supply chain design and planning
    Elias Mota, Bruna Alexandra
    de Sousa Gouveia Carvalho, Ana Isabel Cerqueira
    Azevedo Rodrigues Gomes, Maria Isabel
    Ferreira Dias Barbosa-Povoa, Ana Paula
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 29 (01) : 87 - 117
  • [40] Human-Toxicological Effect and Damage Factors of Carcinogenic and Noncarcinogenic Chemicals for Life Cycle Impact Assessment
    Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
    Rombouts, Linda J. A.
    Ragas, Ad M. J.
    van de Meent, Dik
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 1 (03) : 181 - 244