Multidisciplinary team meetings in urogynaecology

Introduction and hypothesis The concept of multidisciplinary team (MDT) is well accepted in the current National Health Service (NHS) and is considered good practice for the management of chronic conditions. There has been a recent drive to have MDTs in managing women with incontinence and complex prolapse as a result of recommendations by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) etc. Currently, there are no data on the outcome of case discussion at urogynaecology MDTs. The aim of this study was to review the clinical impact of discussion of a select group of cases at an urogynaecology MDT and review the clinical literature to justify the MDT approach. Methods MDT proformas of cases discussed from October 2012 to December 2013 were reviewed. Outcomes of the MDT were compared with recommendations at the initial consultation. This included change in management plan, type of surgery and surgeon as well as time delay due to MDT discussion. Results One hundred six proformas were available for analysis. Age range was 23-89 (58) years. Average time from clinic visit to MDT discussion was 8.32+5.9 days. The MDT recommended a change in management plan in 31 cases (29.3 %), with 11 cases (10.4 %) resulting in alternative surgery and 1 case (0.9%) with an alternative surgeon. In 18.5% of cases, MDT discussion formulated the initial management plan. Conclusions Case discussions at our MDT provide an effective clinical forum to formulate management plans for complex cases. The decision-making process is made robust, without significant impact on waiting time. Investment in setting up MDTs has financial implications but provides patient benefit.