Measuring attitudes towards the dying process: A systematic review of tools

被引:9
|
作者
Groebe, Bernadette [1 ,2 ]
Strupp, Julia [2 ]
Eisenmann, Yvonne [2 ]
Schmidt, Holger [2 ]
Schlomann, Anna [1 ,3 ]
Rietz, Christian [4 ]
Voltz, Raymond [2 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Doctoral Programme GROW Gerontol Res Well Being, Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Cologne, Dept Palliat Med, Fac Med, Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Cologne, Fac Human Sci, Dept Special Educ & Rehabil, Cologne, Germany
[4] Univ Educ Heidelberg, Fac Educ & Social Sci, Dept Educ Sci, Heidelberg, Germany
[5] Univ Cologne, Fac Human Sci, Ctr Hlth Serv Res Cologne, Cologne, Germany
[6] Univ Cologne, Fac Med, Cologne, Germany
[7] Univ Cologne, Ctr Integrated Oncol Cologne Bonn CIO, Fac Med, Cologne, Germany
[8] Univ Cologne, Clin Trials Ctr Cologne, Fac Med, Cologne, Germany
关键词
Attitude; attitude to death; palliative care; systematic review; psychometrics; psychological tests; measurement tool; dying; COLLETT-LESTER FEAR; DEATH ANXIETY SCALE; MULTIDIMENSIONAL ORIENTATION; SPANISH FORM; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; FACTORIAL STRUCTURE; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; SELF-REPORT; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1177/0269216317748889
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: At the end of life, anxious attitudes concerning the dying process are common in patients in Palliative Care. Measurement tools can identify vulnerabilities, resources and the need for subsequent treatment to relieve suffering and support well-being. Aim: To systematically review available tools measuring attitudes towards dying, their operationalization, the method of measurement and the methodological quality including generalizability to different contexts. Design: Systematic review according to the PRISMA Statement. Methodological quality of tools assessed by standardized review criteria. Data sources: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PsyndexTests and the Health and Psychosocial Instruments were searched from their inception to April 2017. Results: A total of 94 identified studies reported the development and/or validation of 44 tools. Of these, 37 were questionnaires and 7 alternative measurement methods (e.g. projective measures). In 34 of 37 questionnaires, the emotional evaluation (e.g. anxiety) towards dying is measured. Dying is operationalized in general items (n=20), in several specific aspects of dying (n=34) and as dying of others (n=14). Methodological quality of tools was reported inconsistently. Nine tools reported good internal consistency. Of 37 tools, 4 were validated in a clinical sample (e.g. terminal cancer; Huntington disease), indicating questionable generalizability to clinical contexts for most tools. Conclusion: Many tools exist to measure attitudes towards the dying process using different endpoints. This overview can serve as decision framework on which tool to apply in which contexts. For clinical application, only few tools were available. Further validation of existing tools and potential alternative methods in various populations is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 837
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment tools measuring health-related empowerment in psychosocially vulnerable populations: a systematic review
    Sandy Campbell
    Jianxia Zhai
    Jing-Yu Tan
    Mursal Azami
    Kym Cunningham
    Sue Kruske
    International Journal for Equity in Health, 20
  • [22] Assessment tools measuring health-related empowerment in psychosocially vulnerable populations: a systematic review
    Campbell, Sandy
    Zhai, Jianxia
    Tan, Jing-Yu
    Azami, Mursal
    Cunningham, Kym
    Kruske, Sue
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2021, 20 (01)
  • [23] Measurement properties of mental health literacy tools measuring help-seeking: a systematic review
    Wei, Yifeng
    McGrath, Patrick J.
    Hayden, Jill
    Kutcher, Stan
    JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH, 2017, 26 (06) : 543 - 555
  • [24] Measuring Palliative Care-Related Knowledge, Attitudes, and Confidence in Home Health Care Clinicians, Patients, and Caregivers: A Systematic Review
    Murali, Komal Patel
    Kang, Jung A.
    Bronstein, David
    McDonald, Margaret V.
    King, Lori
    Chastain, Ashley M.
    Shang, Jingjing
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 25 (10) : 1579 - 1598
  • [25] Observational Tools for Measuring Parent-Infant Interaction: A Systematic Review
    Lotzin, Annett
    Lu, Xiaoxing
    Kriston, Levente
    Schiborr, Julia
    Musal, Teresa
    Romer, Georg
    Ramsauer, Brigitte
    CLINICAL CHILD AND FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2015, 18 (02) : 99 - 132
  • [26] Measuring Forgiveness A Systematic Review
    Fernandez-Capo, Maria
    Recoder Fernandez, Silvia
    Gamiz Sanfeliu, Maria
    Gomez Benito, Juana
    Worthington, Everett L., Jr.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2017, 22 (04) : 247 - 262
  • [27] To Explore the Neonatal Nurses' Beliefs and Attitudes Towards Caring for Dying Neonates in Taiwan
    Chen, Chao-Huei
    Huang, Li-Chi
    Liu, Hsin-Li
    Lee, Ho-Yu
    Wu, Shu-Ya
    Chang, Yue-Cune
    Peng, Niang-Huei
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2013, 17 (10) : 1793 - 1801
  • [28] Student nurses' attitudes towards death and dying in south-east Iran
    Iranmanesh, Sedigheh
    Savenstedt, Stefan
    Abbaszadeh, Abbas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE NURSING, 2008, 14 (05) : 214 - 219
  • [29] What influences attitudes towards clinically assisted hydration in the care of dying patients? A review of the literature
    Gent, Miriam J.
    Fradsham, Sarah
    Whyte, Graham M.
    Mayland, Catriona R.
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2015, 5 (03) : 223 - 231
  • [30] How to optimize the systematic review process using AI tools
    Fabiano, Nicholas
    Gupta, Arnav
    Bhambra, Nishaant
    Luu, Brandon
    Wong, Stanley
    Maaz, Muhammad
    Fiedorowicz, Jess G.
    Smith, Andrew L.
    Solmi, Marco
    JCPP ADVANCES, 2024, 4 (02):