Technical options for the mitigation of direct methane and nitrous oxide emissions from livestock: a review

被引:246
|
作者
Gerber, P. J. [1 ]
Hristov, A. N. [2 ]
Henderson, B. [1 ]
Makkar, H. [1 ]
Oh, J. [2 ]
Lee, C. [2 ]
Meinen, R. [2 ]
Montes, F. [3 ]
Ott, T. [2 ]
Firkins, J. [4 ]
Rotz, A. [5 ]
Dell, C. [5 ]
Adesogan, A. T. [6 ]
Yang, W. Z. [7 ]
Tricarico, J. M. [8 ]
Kebreab, E. [9 ]
Waghorn, G. [10 ]
Dijkstra, J. [11 ]
Oosting, S. [11 ]
机构
[1] Food & Agr Org United Nations, Agr & Consumer protect Dept, I-00153 Rome, Italy
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Plant Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] ARS, Dept Anim Sci, USDA, Pasture Syst & Watershed Management Res Unit, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[6] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608 USA
[7] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
[8] Innovat Ctr US Dairy, Rosemont, IL 60018 USA
[9] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Anim Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[10] DairyNZ, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
[11] Wageningen Univ, Dept Anim Sci, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
greenhouse gases; climate change; animal production; animal feeding; manure management; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; DIETARY NITRATE SUPPLEMENTATION; DAIRY-COWS; NITRIFICATION INHIBITORS; REDUCE METHANE; ANIMAL PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT OPTIONS; RUMEN FERMENTATION; DICYANDIAMIDE DCD; GASEOUS EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1017/S1751731113000876
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Although livestock production accounts for a sizeable share of global greenhouse gas emissions, numerous technical options have been identified to mitigate these emissions. In this review, a subset of these options, which have proven to be effective, are discussed. These include measures to reduce CH4 emissions from enteric fermentation by ruminants, the largest single emission source from the global livestock sector, and for reducing CH4 and N2O emissions from manure. A unique feature of this review is the high level of attention given to interactions between mitigation options and productivity. Among the feed supplement options for lowering enteric emissions, dietary lipids, nitrates and ionophores are identified as the most effective. Forage quality, feed processing and precision feeding have the best prospects among the various available feed and feed management measures. With regard to manure, dietary measures that reduce the amount of N excreted (e.g. better matching of dietary protein to animal needs), shift N excretion from urine to faeces (e.g. tannin inclusion at low levels) and reduce the amount of fermentable organic matter excreted are recommended. Among the many end-of-pipe' measures available for manure management, approaches that capture and/or process CH4 emissions during storage (e.g. anaerobic digestion, biofiltration, composting), as well as subsurface injection of manure, are among the most encouraging options flagged in this section of the review. The importance of a multiple gas perspective is critical when assessing mitigation potentials, because most of the options reviewed show strong interactions among sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The paper reviews current knowledge on potential pollution swapping, whereby the reduction of one GHG or emission source leads to unintended increases in another.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 234
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Options for the abatement of methane and nitrous oxide from ruminant production: A review
    Eckard, R. J.
    Grainger, C.
    de Klein, C. A. M.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2010, 130 (1-3) : 47 - 56
  • [22] Mitigation of postharvest nitrous oxide emissions from soybean ecosystems: a review
    Uchida, Yoshitaka
    Akiyama, Hiroko
    SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2013, 59 (04) : 477 - 487
  • [23] Towards a representative assessment of methane and nitrous oxide emissions and mitigation options from manure management of beef cattle feedlots in Brazil
    Costa Junior, C.
    Cerri, C. E. P.
    Dorich, C. D.
    Maia, S. M. F.
    Bernoux, M.
    Cerri, C. C.
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2015, 20 (03) : 425 - 438
  • [24] Towards a representative assessment of methane and nitrous oxide emissions and mitigation options from manure management of beef cattle feedlots in Brazil
    C. Costa Junior
    C. E. P. Cerri
    C. D. Dorich
    S. M. F. Maia
    M. Bernoux
    C. C. Cerri
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2015, 20 : 425 - 438
  • [25] Dietary Nitrate for Methane Mitigation Leads to Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Dairy Cows
    Petersen, S. O.
    Hellwing, A. L. F.
    Brask, M.
    Hojberg, O.
    Poulsen, M.
    Zhu, Z.
    Baral, Khagendra R.
    Lund, P.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2015, 44 (04) : 1063 - 1070
  • [26] Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from Canadian animal agriculture: A review
    Kebreab, E.
    Clark, K.
    Wagner-Riddle, C.
    France, J.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2006, 86 (02) : 135 - 158
  • [27] Dutch abiogenic emissions of methane and nitrous oxide and options for emission reduction
    Oonk, H
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 37 (6-8) : 985 - 989
  • [28] Dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions from ruminants:A review of plant tannin mitigation options
    Byeng RMin
    Sandra Solaiman
    Heidi MWaldrip
    David Parker
    Richard WTodd
    David Brauer
    Animal Nutrition, 2020, 6 (03) : 231 - 246
  • [29] Dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions from ruminants:A review of plant tannin mitigation options
    Byeng R.Min
    Sandra Solaiman
    Heidi M.Waldrip
    David Parker
    Richard W.Todd
    David Brauer
    Animal Nutrition , 2020, (03) : 231 - 246
  • [30] Dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions from ruminants: A review of plant tannin mitigation options
    Min, Byeng R.
    Solaiman, Sandra
    Waldrip, Heidi M.
    Parker, David
    Todd, Richard W.
    Brauer, David
    ANIMAL NUTRITION, 2020, 6 (03): : 231 - 246