Technical options for the mitigation of direct methane and nitrous oxide emissions from livestock: a review

被引:247
作者
Gerber, P. J. [1 ]
Hristov, A. N. [2 ]
Henderson, B. [1 ]
Makkar, H. [1 ]
Oh, J. [2 ]
Lee, C. [2 ]
Meinen, R. [2 ]
Montes, F. [3 ]
Ott, T. [2 ]
Firkins, J. [4 ]
Rotz, A. [5 ]
Dell, C. [5 ]
Adesogan, A. T. [6 ]
Yang, W. Z. [7 ]
Tricarico, J. M. [8 ]
Kebreab, E. [9 ]
Waghorn, G. [10 ]
Dijkstra, J. [11 ]
Oosting, S. [11 ]
机构
[1] Food & Agr Org United Nations, Agr & Consumer protect Dept, I-00153 Rome, Italy
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Plant Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] ARS, Dept Anim Sci, USDA, Pasture Syst & Watershed Management Res Unit, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[6] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608 USA
[7] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
[8] Innovat Ctr US Dairy, Rosemont, IL 60018 USA
[9] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Anim Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[10] DairyNZ, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
[11] Wageningen Univ, Dept Anim Sci, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
greenhouse gases; climate change; animal production; animal feeding; manure management; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; DIETARY NITRATE SUPPLEMENTATION; DAIRY-COWS; NITRIFICATION INHIBITORS; REDUCE METHANE; ANIMAL PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT OPTIONS; RUMEN FERMENTATION; DICYANDIAMIDE DCD; GASEOUS EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1017/S1751731113000876
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Although livestock production accounts for a sizeable share of global greenhouse gas emissions, numerous technical options have been identified to mitigate these emissions. In this review, a subset of these options, which have proven to be effective, are discussed. These include measures to reduce CH4 emissions from enteric fermentation by ruminants, the largest single emission source from the global livestock sector, and for reducing CH4 and N2O emissions from manure. A unique feature of this review is the high level of attention given to interactions between mitigation options and productivity. Among the feed supplement options for lowering enteric emissions, dietary lipids, nitrates and ionophores are identified as the most effective. Forage quality, feed processing and precision feeding have the best prospects among the various available feed and feed management measures. With regard to manure, dietary measures that reduce the amount of N excreted (e.g. better matching of dietary protein to animal needs), shift N excretion from urine to faeces (e.g. tannin inclusion at low levels) and reduce the amount of fermentable organic matter excreted are recommended. Among the many end-of-pipe' measures available for manure management, approaches that capture and/or process CH4 emissions during storage (e.g. anaerobic digestion, biofiltration, composting), as well as subsurface injection of manure, are among the most encouraging options flagged in this section of the review. The importance of a multiple gas perspective is critical when assessing mitigation potentials, because most of the options reviewed show strong interactions among sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The paper reviews current knowledge on potential pollution swapping, whereby the reduction of one GHG or emission source leads to unintended increases in another.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 234
页数:15
相关论文
共 106 条
[91]   Emissions of N2O and CH4 during the composting of liquid swine manure [J].
Thompson, AG ;
Wagner-Riddle, C ;
Fleming, R .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2004, 91 (1-3) :87-104
[92]   Effects of slurry pre-treatment and application technique on short-term N2O emissions as determined by a new non-linear approach [J].
Thomsen, Ingrid K. ;
Pedersen, Asger R. ;
Nyord, Tavs ;
Petersen, Soren O. .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 136 (3-4) :227-235
[93]   UTILIZATION OF ENERGY AND NITROGEN BY YEARLING HOLSTEIN CATTLE FED DIRECT-CUT ALFALFA OR ORCHARDGRASS ENSILED WITH FORMIC-ACID PLUS FORMALDEHYDE [J].
TYRRELL, HF ;
THOMSON, DJ ;
WALDO, DR ;
GOERING, HK ;
HAALAND, GL .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1992, 70 (10) :3163-3177
[94]   Persistency of methane mitigation by dietary nitrate supplementation in dairy cows [J].
van Zijderveld, S. M. ;
Gerrits, W. J. J. ;
Dijkstra, J. ;
Newbold, J. R. ;
Hulshof, R. B. A. ;
Perdok, H. B. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2011, 94 (08) :4028-4038
[95]   Effects of a combination of feed additives on methane production, diet digestibility, and animal performance in lactating dairy cows [J].
van Zijderveld, S. M. ;
Fonken, B. ;
Dijkstra, J. ;
Gerrits, W. J. J. ;
Perdok, H. B. ;
Fokkink, W. ;
Newbold, J. R. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2011, 94 (03) :1445-1454
[96]   Nitrate and sulfate: Effective alternative hydrogen sinks for mitigation of ruminal methane production in sheep [J].
van Zijderveld, S. M. ;
Gerrits, W. J. J. ;
Apajalahti, J. A. ;
Newbold, J. R. ;
Dijkstra, J. ;
Leng, R. A. ;
Perdok, H. B. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 (12) :5856-5866
[97]  
VanderZaag AC, 2008, APPL ENG AGRIC, V24, P657
[98]  
Varel VH, 1999, J ANIM SCI, V77, P1162
[99]   Influence of thymol and a urease inhibitor on coliform bacteria, odor, urea, and methane from a swine production manure pit [J].
Varel, Vincent H. ;
Wells, James E. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2007, 36 (03) :773-779
[100]   The impact of slurry application technique on nitrous oxide emission from agricultural soils [J].
Velthof, G. L. ;
Mosquera, J. .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 140 (1-2) :298-308