Multi-Fidelity Gradient-Based Strategy for Robust Optimization in Computational Fluid Dynamics

被引:4
作者
Serafino, Aldo [1 ,2 ]
Obert, Benoit [1 ]
Cinnella, Paola [2 ]
机构
[1] Enertime, 1 Rue Moulin Bruyeres, F-92400 Courbevoie, France
[2] Arts & Metiers ParisTech, Lab Dynfluid, 151 Blvd Hop, F-75013 Paris, France
关键词
robust design optimization; uncertainty quantification; gradient enhanced kriging; method of moments; multi-fidelity surrogate; continuous adjoint; discrete adjoint; AERODYNAMIC DESIGN; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; MODELS; APPROXIMATION; AIRFOIL;
D O I
10.3390/a13100248
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Efficient Robust Design Optimization (RDO) strategies coupling a parsimonious uncertainty quantification (UQ) method with a surrogate-based multi-objective genetic algorithm (SMOGA) are investigated for a test problem in computational fluid dynamics (CFD), namely the inverse robust design of an expansion nozzle. The low-order statistics (mean and variance) of the stochastic cost function are computed through either a gradient-enhanced kriging (GEK) surrogate or through the less expensive, lower fidelity, first-order method of moments (MoM). Both the continuous (non-intrusive) and discrete (intrusive) adjoint methods are evaluated for computing the gradients required for GEK and MoM. In all cases, the results are assessed against a reference kriging UQ surrogate not using gradient information. Subsequently, the GEK and MoM UQ solvers are fused together to build a multi-fidelity surrogate with adaptive infill enrichment for the SMOGA optimizer. The resulting hybrid multi-fidelity SMOGA RDO strategy ensures a good tradeoff between cost and accuracy, thus representing an efficient approach for complex RDO problems.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 74 条
[31]   The Tapenade Automatic Differentiation Tool: Principles, Model, and Specification [J].
Hascoet, Laurent ;
Pascual, Valerie .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MATHEMATICAL SOFTWARE, 2013, 39 (03)
[32]  
Hazelton Martin L., 2011, Methods of Moments Estimation, P816
[33]  
Hercus SJ., 2011, Fluids Eng Div Summer Meet, V44403, P1739
[34]  
Herman J., 2017, The Journal of Open Source Software, V2, P97, DOI [10.21105/joss.00097, DOI 10.21105/JOSS, DOI 10.21105/JOSS.00097]
[35]  
Hirsch C., 2007, NUMERICAL COMPUTATIO, V2nd, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-075066594-0/50038-2
[36]   Optimum aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equations [J].
Jameson, A ;
Martinelli, L ;
Pierce, NA .
THEORETICAL AND COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS, 1998, 10 (1-4) :213-237
[37]   Statistical improvement criteria for use in multiobjective design optimization [J].
Keane, AJ .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2006, 44 (04) :879-891
[38]   Robust design optimization using surrogate models [J].
Keane, Andy J. ;
Voutchkov, Ivan I. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 7 (01) :44-55
[39]   Bayesian calibration of computer models [J].
Kennedy, MC ;
O'Hagan, A .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2001, 63 :425-450
[40]  
Kochenderfer M.J., 2019, Algorithms for Optimization