Performance Evaluation of Smartphone Inertial Sensors Measurement for Range of Motion

被引:84
作者
Mourcou, Quentin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fleury, Anthony [2 ,3 ]
Franco, Celine [1 ]
Klopcic, Frederic [2 ,3 ]
Vuillerme, Nicolas [1 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Grenoble Alpes, AGIM, F-38700 La Tronche, France
[2] Univ Lille, F-59000 Lille, France
[3] URIA, Mines Douai, F-59508 Douai, France
[4] Inst Univ France, F-75000 Paris, France
[5] Univ Geneva, LAI Jean Raoul Scherrer, CH-1206 Geneva, Switzerland
[6] Univ Grenoble Alpes, F-38041 St Martin Dheres, France
[7] Aalborg Univ, Dept Hlth Sci & Technol, Ctr Sensory Motor Interact SMI, Lab Ergon & Work Related Disorders, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
smartphone sensing; IMU; Kalman filter; validation; FALL DETECTION; KNEE ANGLE; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; SHOULDER; SYSTEM; ELBOW; APP;
D O I
10.3390/s150923168
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Over the years, smartphones have become tools for scientific and clinical research. They can, for instance, be used to assess range of motion and joint angle measurement. In this paper, our aim was to determine if smartphones are reliable and accurate enough for clinical motion research. This work proposes an evaluation of different smartphone sensors performance and different manufacturer algorithm performances with the comparison to the gold standard, an industrial robotic arm with an actual standard use inertial motion unit in clinical measurement, an Xsens product. Both dynamic and static protocols were used to perform these comparisons. Root Mean Square (RMS) mean values results for static protocol are under 0.3 degrees for the different smartphones. RMS mean values results for dynamic protocol are more prone to bias induced by Euler angle representation. Statistical results prove that there are no filter effect on results for both protocols and no hardware effect. Smartphones performance can be compared to the Xsens gold standard for clinical research.
引用
收藏
页码:23168 / 23187
页数:20
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] A smartphone-based fall detection system
    Abbate, Stefano
    Avvenuti, Marco
    Bonatesta, Francesco
    Cola, Guglielmo
    Corsini, Paolo
    Vecchio, Alessio
    [J]. PERVASIVE AND MOBILE COMPUTING, 2012, 8 (06) : 883 - 899
  • [2] Anguita Davide, 2013, 21 EUR S ART NEUR NE
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, Technical report
  • [4] Brosseau L, 1997, Physiother Res Int, V2, P150
  • [5] From Smart to Cognitive Phones
    Campbell, Andrew
    Choudhury, Tanzeem
    [J]. IEEE PERVASIVE COMPUTING, 2012, 11 (03) : 7 - 11
  • [6] Chung WM, 2011, HONG KONG PHYSIOTHER, V29, P97, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HKPJ.2011.08.015
  • [7] Pervasive computing at scale: Transforming the state of the art
    Cook, Diane J.
    Das, Sajal K.
    [J]. PERVASIVE AND MOBILE COMPUTING, 2012, 8 (01) : 22 - 35
  • [8] Ambulatory measurement of shoulder and elbow kinematics through inertial and magnetic sensors
    Cutti, Andrea Giovanni
    Giovanardi, Andrea
    Rocchi, Laura
    Davalli, Angelo
    Sacchetti, Rinaldo
    [J]. MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2008, 46 (02) : 169 - 178
  • [9] Euston M., 2008, P IEEE RSJ INT C INT
  • [10] CLINICAL MEASUREMENT OF RANGE OF MOTION - REVIEW OF GONIOMETRY EMPHASIZING RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY
    GAJDOSIK, RL
    BOHANNON, RW
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1987, 67 (12): : 1867 - 1872