Effect of grazing on the cow welfare of dairy herds evaluated by a multidimensional welfare index

被引:57
|
作者
Burow, E. [1 ]
Rousing, T. [1 ]
Thomsen, P. T. [1 ]
Otten, N. D. [2 ]
Sorensen, J. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Anim Sci, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Large Anim Sci Populat Biol, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
关键词
grazing time; welfare index; dairy cow; aggregation; panel; ANIMAL-WELFARE; RISK-FACTORS; PREVALENCE; MILK; LAMENESS; BEHAVIOR; PASTURE; AGGREGATION; MORTALITY; EXERCISE;
D O I
10.1017/S1751731112002297
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Structural development in the prime sector has led to increasing herd sizes and new barn systems, followed by less summer grazing for dairy cows in Denmark. Effects of grazing on single welfare measures in dairy cows - for example, the presence of integument alterations or mortality - have been studied under different conditions. However, the effect of grazing on welfare, conceptualised as the multidimensional physical and mental state of the animal, has not yet been studied in contemporary cubicle loose-housing systems. The aim of our study was to investigate, based on a Welfare Quality (R) inspired multidimensional dairy cow welfare assessment protocol, the within-herd effect of summer grazing compared with winter barn housing in Danish dairy herds with cubicle free-stall systems for the lactating cows. Our hypothesis was that cow welfare in dairy herds was better during summer grazing than during full-time winter housing. Furthermore, we expected improved welfare with an increase in daily summer grazing hours. In total, 41 herds have been visited once in the winter and once in the summer of 2010 to assess their welfare status with 17 different animal-and resource-based welfare measures. A panel of 20 experts on cattle welfare and husbandry evaluated the relative weight of the 17 welfare measures in a multidimensional assessment scheme. They estimated exact weights for a priori constituted severe compared with moderate scores of welfare impairment concerning each measure, as well as relevance of the measures in relation to each other. A welfare index (WI; possible range 0 to 5400) was calculated for each herd and season with a higher index indicating poorer welfare. The within-herd comparison of summer grazing v. winter housing considered all the 17 measures. The mean WI in summer was significantly lower (better) than in winter (mean 2926 v. 3330; paired t-test P = 0.0001) based on a better state of the integument, claw conformation and better access to water and food. Body condition and faeces consistence were worse in summer. Many daily grazing hours (range average above 3 to 9 h) turned out to be more beneficial than few daily grazing hours (range average above 9 to 21 h) for the welfare of the dairy herds. In conclusion, this study reports a positive within-herd effect of summer grazing on dairy cow welfare, where many daily grazing hours were more beneficial than few daily grazing hours.
引用
收藏
页码:834 / 842
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A weak point analysis of welfare in Danish dairy herds using two different welfare assessment systems
    Otten, N. D.
    Rousing, T.
    de Oliveira, V. H. S.
    Reiten, M.
    Michelsen, A-M
    Hakansson, F.
    Lund, V. P.
    Houe, H.
    Denwood, M.
    Sorensen, J. T.
    Forkman, B.
    Kirchner, M. K.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2020, 29 (02) : 197 - 207
  • [42] Associations between On-farm Welfare, Milk Production, and Reproductive Performance in Dairy Herds in Northwestern Spain
    Bugueiro, Ana
    Fouz, Ramiro
    Dieguez, Francisco J.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL WELFARE SCIENCE, 2021, 24 (01) : 29 - 38
  • [43] Welfare Assessment in Tunisian Dairy Herds by Animal-Linked Parameters and Performance Efficiency
    Mhamdi, M.
    Darej, C.
    Bouallegue, M.
    Brar, S. Kaur
    Ben Hamouda, M.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 3 (02): : 387 - 395
  • [44] Public opinion on UK milk marketing and dairy cow welfare
    Ellis, K. A.
    Billington, K.
    McNeil, B.
    McKeegan, D. E. F.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2009, 18 (03) : 267 - 282
  • [45] A new approach and insights on modelling the impact of production diseases on dairy cow welfare
    Edwardes, F.
    van der Voort, M.
    Rodenburg, T. B.
    Hogeveen, H.
    ANIMAL, 2024, 18 (04)
  • [46] Genomic dairy cattle breeding: risks and opportunities for cow welfare
    Mark, T.
    Sandoe, P.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2010, 19 : 113 - 121
  • [47] Welfare in Danish dairy herds .1. Disease management routines in 1983 and 1994
    Alban, L
    Agger, JF
    ACTA VETERINARIA SCANDINAVICA, 1996, 37 (01) : 49 - 63
  • [48] Association between Lameness and Indicators of Dairy Cow Welfare Based on Locomotion Scoring, Body and Hock Condition, Leg Hygiene and Lying Behavior
    Sadiq, Mohammed B.
    Ramanoon, Siti Z.
    Mossadeq, Wan Mastura Shaik
    Mansor, Rozaihan
    Syed-Hussain, Sharifah Salmah
    ANIMALS, 2017, 7 (11):
  • [49] Identifying areas of animal welfare concern in different production stages in Danish pig herds using the Danish Animal Welfare Index (DAWIN)
    Michelsen, Anne Marie
    Hakansson, Franziska
    Pedersen Lund, Vibe
    Kirchner, Marlene Katharina
    Otten, Nina Dam
    Denwood, Matthew
    Rousing, Tine
    Houe, Hans
    Forkman, Bjorn
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2023, 32
  • [50] Public concerns about dairy-cow welfare: how should the industry respond?
    Weary, D. M.
    von Keyserlingk, M. A. G.
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2017, 57 (07) : 1201 - 1209