Assessing the Role of Ultrasound in Predicting the Biological Behavior of Breast Cancer

被引:77
作者
Irshad, Abid [1 ]
Leddy, Rebecca [1 ]
Pisano, Etta [1 ]
Baker, Nathaniel [2 ]
Lewis, Madelene [1 ]
Ackerman, Susan [1 ]
Campbell, Amy [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ S Carolina, Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Med Univ S Carolina, Dept Biostat, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
关键词
breast cancer; estrogen receptor; progesterone receptor; triple-negative tumor; ultrasound; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; BASAL-LIKE PHENOTYPE; DUCTAL CARCINOMA; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; PATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS; MOLECULAR PORTRAITS; NEGATIVE TUMORS; GROWTH-FACTOR; TRIPLE; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.12.8781
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to correlate various ultrasound features of breast cancer with tumor grade, and with estrogen, progesterone, and ERRB2 (formerly HER2) receptor status as well as to assess the predictive value of these features. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The features of breast cancers found by using ultrasound between January 2010 and June 2011 were reviewed for tumor size, margins, and posterior acoustic features. The tumor margins were classified into spiculated, angular, indistinct, lobulated or microlobulated, and circumscribed. The posterior acoustic features were classified into shadowing, enhancement, mixed pattern, and no change. The individual features were correlated with the estrogen receptor (ER)-progesterone receptor (PR) and ERRB2 receptor status and tumor grade. RESULTS. Among 160 patients with breast cancer, 102 (63.8%) were ER-positive/PR-positive, 32 (20.0%) were ER-positive/PR-negative, and 26 (16.3%) were ER-negative/PR-negative (22 were triple-negative). Tumors with posterior shadowing have greater than nine times the odds of having ER-positive findings (95% CI, 2.09-40.81; p = 0.011) and greater than 13 times the odds of having a lower-grade tumor (I or II vs III; 95% CI, 4.90-36.54; p < 0.001) than those without posterior shadowing. Tumors with posterior enhancement have greater than eight times the odds of having at least one negative receptor (95% CI, 3.97-18.11; p < 0.001) and 24 times the odds of having a high-grade tumor (95% CI, 9.91-58.14; p < 0.001) than those without posterior enhancement. CONCLUSION. The presence of posterior shadowing is strongly associated with an ER-positive and low-grade tumor, whereas the presence of posterior enhancement is strongly associated with a high-grade tumor and with moderate risk of being receptor negative.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 290
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2003, BREAST IM REP DAT SY
  • [2] Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters
    Basu, Sandip
    Chen, Wengen
    Tchou, Julia
    Mavi, Ayse
    Cermik, Tevfik
    Czerniecki, Brian
    Schnall, Mitchell
    Alavi, Abass
    [J]. CANCER, 2008, 112 (05) : 995 - 1000
  • [3] SYNTHESIS AND SECRETION OF PLATELET-DERIVED GROWTH-FACTOR BY HUMAN-BREAST CANCER CELL-LINES
    BRONZERT, DA
    PANTAZIS, P
    ANTONIADES, HN
    KASID, A
    DAVIDSON, N
    DICKSON, RB
    LIPPMAN, ME
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1987, 84 (16) : 5763 - 5767
  • [4] Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study
    Carey, Lisa A.
    Perou, Charles M.
    Livasy, Chad A.
    Dressler, Lynn G.
    Cowan, David
    Conway, Kathleen
    Karaca, Gamze
    Troester, Melissa A.
    Tse, Chiu Kit
    Edmiston, Sharon
    Deming, Sandra L.
    Geradts, Joseph
    Cheang, Maggie C. U.
    Nielsen, Torsten O.
    Moorman, Patricia G.
    Earp, H. Shelton
    Millikan, Robert C.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (21): : 2492 - 2502
  • [5] Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value then triple-negative phenotype
    Cheang, Maggie C. U.
    Voduc, David
    Bajdik, Chris
    Leung, Samuel
    McKinney, Steven
    Chia, Stephen K.
    Perou, Charles M.
    Nielsen, Torsten O.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 14 (05) : 1368 - 1376
  • [6] Triple-negative breast cancer: Clinical features and patterns of recurrence
    Dent, Rebecca
    Trudeau, Maureen
    Pritchard, Kathleen I.
    Hanna, Wedad M.
    Kahn, Harriet K.
    Sawka, Carol A.
    Lickley, Lavina A.
    Rawlinson, Ellen
    Sun, Ping
    Narod, Steven A.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 13 (15) : 4429 - 4434
  • [7] Multimodality Imaging of Triple Receptor-Negative Tumors With Mammography, Ultrasound, and MRI
    Dogan, Basak E.
    Gonzalez-Angulo, Ana Maria
    Gilcrease, Michael
    Dryden, Mark J.
    Yang, Wei Tse
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (04) : 1160 - 1166
  • [8] Basal-like grade III invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: patterns of metastasis and long-term survival
    Fulford, Laura G.
    Reis-Filho, Jorge S.
    Ryder, Ken
    Jones, Chris
    Gillett, Cheryl E.
    Hanby, Andrew
    Easton, Douglas
    Lakhani, Sunil R.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 9 (01)
  • [9] The molecular portraits of breast tumors are conserved across microarray platforms
    Hu, Zhiyuan
    Fan, Cheng
    Oh, Daniel S.
    Marron, J. S.
    He, Xiaping
    Qaqish, Bahjat F.
    Livasy, Chad
    Carey, Lisa A.
    Reynolds, Evangeline
    Dressler, Lynn
    Nobel, Andrew
    Parker, Joel
    Ewend, Matthew G.
    Sawyer, Lynda R.
    Wu, Junyuan
    Liu, Yudong
    Nanda, Rita
    Tretiakova, Maria
    Orrico, Alejandra Ruiz
    Dreher, Donna
    Palazzo, Juan P.
    Perreard, Laurent
    Nelson, Edward
    Mone, Mary
    Hansen, Heidi
    Mullins, Michael
    Quackenbush, John F.
    Ellis, Matthew J.
    Olopade, Olufunmilayo I.
    Bernard, Philip S.
    Perou, Charles M.
    [J]. BMC GENOMICS, 2006, 7 (1)
  • [10] Noncalcified Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Imaging and Histologic Findings in 36 Tumors
    Kim, Jae Hwan
    Ko, Eun Sook
    Kim, Do Youn
    Han, Heon
    Sohn, Jeong-Hee
    Choe, Du Hwan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (07) : 903 - 910