Removal of diclofenac by conventional drinking water treatment processes and granular activated carbon filtration

被引:79
|
作者
Rigobello, Eliane Sloboda [1 ]
Dantas, Angela Di Bernardo [2 ]
Di Bernardo, Luiz [3 ]
Vieira, Eny Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Chem Sao Carlos, Dept Chem & Mol Phys, BR-13566570 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Assoc Sch Ribeirao Preto UNAERP, BR-14906900 Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos Sch Engn, Dept Hydraul & Sanitat, BR-13566570 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Diclofenac; Drinking water treatment; Chlorine; Chlorine dioxide; Granular activated carbon; Byproducts; ADVANCED OXIDATION PROCESSES; AQUATIC HUMIC SUBSTANCES; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTORS; WASTE-WATER; ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS; CHLORINE DIOXIDE; TREATMENT PLANTS; PHARMACEUTICALS; DEGRADATION; FATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.03.010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study was carried out to evaluate the efficiency of conventional drinking water treatment processes with and without pre-oxidation with chlorine and chlorine dioxide and the use of granular activated carbon (GAC) filtration for the removal of diclofenac (DCF). Water treatment was performed using the Jar test with filters on a lab scale, employing nonchlorinated artesian well water prepared with aquatic humic substances to yield 20 HU true color, kaolin turbidity of 70 NTU and 1 mg L-1 DCF. For the quantification of DCF in water samples, solid phase extraction and HPLC-DAD methods were developed and validated. There was no removal of DCF in coagulation with aluminum sulfate (3.47 mg Al L-1 and pH = 6.5), flocculation, sedimentation and sand filtration. In the treatment with pre-oxidation and disinfection, DCF was partially removed, but the concentration of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) was unchanged and byproducts of DCF were observed. Chlorine dioxide was more effective than chorine in oxidizing DCF. In conclusion, the identification of DCF and DOC in finished water indicated the incomplete elimination of DCF through conventional treatments. Nevertheless, conventional drinking water treatment followed by GAC filtration was effective in removing DCF ( >= 99.7%). In the oxidation with chlorine, three byproducts were tentatively identified, corresponding to a hydroxylation, aromatic substitution of one hydrogen by chlorine and a decarboxylation/hydroxylation. Oxidation with chlorine dioxide resulted in only one byproduct (hydroxylation). (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 191
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of natural organic matter removal by ultrafiltration, granular activated carbon filtration and full scale conventional water treatment
    Marais, S. S.
    Ncube, E. J.
    Msagati, T. A. M.
    Mamba, B. B.
    Nkambule, Thabo T., I
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 6 (05): : 6282 - 6289
  • [2] Oyster shell for drinking water filtration compared with granular activated carbon: advantages and limitations
    Lin, Huirong
    Hou, Quanyang
    Sun, Xiaohui
    Hu, Gongren
    Yu, Ruilian
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (58) : 121475 - 121486
  • [3] Mechanical resistance of granular activated carbon media in drinking water treatment
    Philibert, Marc
    Zacchi, Calini Moser
    Pottier, Christian
    Sacareau, Damien
    Baudin, Isabelle
    WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL, 2020, 34 (S1) : 381 - 389
  • [4] Removal and distribution of antibiotics and resistance genes in conventional and advanced drinking water treatment processes
    Wang, Jun
    Sha, Xueni
    Chen, Xiaofei
    Zhuo, Haihua
    Xie, Weimin
    Zhou, Zhi
    He, Xiaoman
    Wu, Li
    Li, Bolin
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2022, 50
  • [5] Removal of oxidative stress and genotoxic activities during drinking water production by ozonation and granular activated carbon filtration
    Yu, Maria
    Lavonen, Elin
    Oskarsson, Agneta
    Lundqvist, Johan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUROPE, 2021, 33 (01)
  • [6] Diclofenac removal from water with ozone and activated carbon
    Beltran, Fernando J.
    Pocostales, Pablo
    Alvarez, Pedro
    Oropesa, Ana L.
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2009, 163 (2-3) : 768 - 776
  • [7] Oyster shell for drinking water filtration compared with granular activated carbon: advantages and limitations
    Huirong Lin
    Quanyang Hou
    Xiaohui Sun
    Gongren Hu
    Ruilian Yu
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 121475 - 121486
  • [8] Fluidisation characteristics of granular activated carbon in drinking water treatment applications
    Kramer, O. J., I
    van Schaik, C.
    Dacomba-Torres, P. D. R.
    de Moel, P. J.
    Boek, E. S.
    Baars, E. T.
    Padding, J. T.
    van der Hoek, J. P.
    ADVANCED POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 32 (09) : 3174 - 3188
  • [9] Biological removal processes in aerobic granular sludge exposed to diclofenac
    Bessa, Vania S.
    Moreira, Irina S.
    Van Loosdrecht, Mark C. M.
    Castro, Paula M. L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 43 (21) : 3295 - 3308
  • [10] Removal of Agrichemicals from Water Using Granular Activated Carbon Filtration
    Grant, George A.
    Fisher, Paul R.
    Barrett, James E.
    Wilson, Patrick C.
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2019, 230 (01)