Assessment of energy performance in the life-cycle of biogas production

被引:374
|
作者
Berglund, M [1 ]
Börjesson, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Environm & Energy Syst Studies LTH, SE-22362 Lund, Sweden
来源
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY | 2006年 / 30卷 / 03期
关键词
energy analysis; biogas; biogas production system; anaerobic digestion; energy input; energy balance;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.11.011
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Energy balances are analysed from a life-cycle perspective for biogas systems based on 8 different raw materials. The analysis is based on published data and relates to Swedish conditions. The results show that the energy input into biogas systems (i.e. large-scale biogas plants) overall corresponds to 20-40% (on average approximately 30%) of the energy content in the biogas produced. The net energy output turns negative when transport distances exceed approximately 200 kin (manure), or up to 700 km (slaughterhouse waste). Large variations exist in energy efficiency among the biogas systems studied. These variations depend both on the properties of the raw materials studied and on the system design and allocation methods chosen. The net energy output from biogas systems based on raw materials that have high water content and low biogas yield (e.g. manure) is relatively low. When energy-demanding handling of the raw materials is required, the energy input increases significantly. For instance, in a ley crop-based biogas system, the ley cropping alone corresponds to approximately 40% of the energy input. Overall, operation of the biogas plant is the most energy-demanding process, corresponding to 40-80% of the energy input into the systems. Thus, the results are substantially affected by the assumptions made about the allocation of a plant's entire energy demand among raw materials, e.g. regarding biogas yield or need of additional water for dilution. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 266
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life-cycle assessment of microalgae culture coupled to biogas production
    Collet, Pierre
    Helias, Arnaud
    Lardon, Laurent
    Ras, Monique
    Goy, Romy-Alice
    Steyer, Jean-Philippe
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (01) : 207 - 214
  • [2] Dynamic energy modelling for ship life-cycle performance assessment
    Cichowicz, Jakub
    Theotokatos, Gerasimos
    Vassalos, Dracos
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2015, 110 : 49 - 61
  • [3] Life-cycle energy production and emissions mitigation by comprehensive biogas-digestate utilization
    Chen, Shaoqing
    Chen, Bin
    Song, Dan
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 114 : 357 - 364
  • [4] A life cycle energy assessment for biogas energy in Serbia
    Cvetkovic, Slobodan
    Radoicic, Tatjana Kaluderovic
    Vukadinovic, Bojana
    Kijevcanin, Mirjana
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2016, 38 (20) : 3095 - 3102
  • [5] Life-cycle assessment of desalination technologies integrated with energy production systems
    Raluy, RG
    Serra, L
    Uche, J
    Valero, A
    DESALINATION, 2004, 167 (1-3) : 445 - 458
  • [6] Energy-Efficient Routes for the Production of Gasoline from Biogas and Pyrolysis Oil-Process Design and Life-Cycle Assessment
    Sundaram, Smitha
    kolb, Gunther
    Hessel, Volker
    Wang, Qi
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2017, 56 (12) : 3373 - 3387
  • [7] Life-Cycle Assessment of Adsorbents for Biohydrogen Production
    Seo, Yuna
    Suzuki, Masaya
    Takagi, Tetsuichi
    Dowaki, Kiyoshi
    RESOURCES-BASEL, 2019, 8 (01):
  • [8] LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT FOR SUSTAINABLE WINE PRODUCTION
    Pandelieva, Ivanka
    GEOCONFERENCE ON ECOLOGY, ECONOMICS, EDUCATION AND LEGISLATION, SGEM 2014, VOL III, 2014, : 239 - 243
  • [9] Energy profiling in the life-cycle assessment of buildings
    Crosbie, Tracey
    Dawood, Nashwan
    Dean, John
    MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2010, 21 (01) : 20 - 31
  • [10] Life-cycle assessment and embodied energy: a review
    Menzies, G. F.
    Turan, S.
    Banfill, P. F. G.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, 2007, 160 (04) : 135 - 143