Identification of Microbial Genetic Capacities and Potential Mechanisms Within the Rumen Microbiome Explaining Differences in Beef Cattle Feed Efficiency

被引:39
作者
Auffret, Marc D. [1 ,5 ]
Stewart, Robert D. [2 ,3 ]
Dewhurst, Richard J. [1 ]
Duthie, Carol-Anne [1 ]
Watson, Mick [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Roehe, Rainer [1 ]
机构
[1] Scotlands Rural Coll SRUC, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Div Genet & Genom, Roslin Inst, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Univ Edinburgh, R D SVS, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Roslin Inst, Edinburgh Genom, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[5] Danone Nutricia Res, Innovat Sci & Nutr Dept, Gut & Microbiol Labs, Palaiseau, France
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
rumen microbiome; predicted microbial mechanisms; feed conversion efficiency; high concentrate diet; metagenomic sequencing; METHANE EMISSIONS; SP-NOV; COMMUNITY; DIET; TRAITS; FERMENTATION; PERFORMANCE; PROPIONATE; BACTERIA; HYDROGEN;
D O I
10.3389/fmicb.2020.01229
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
In this study,Bos Tauruscattle offered one high concentrate diet (92% concentrate-8% straw) during two independent trials allowed us to classify 72 animals comprising of two cattle breeds as "Low" or "High" feed efficiency groups. Digesta samples were taken from individual beef cattle at the abattoir. After metagenomic sequencing, the rumen microbiome composition and genes were determined. Applying a targeted approach based on current biological evidence, 27 genes associated with host-microbiome interaction activities were selected. Partial least square analysis enabled the identification of the most significant genes and genera of feed efficiency (VIP > 0.8) across years of the trial and breeds when comparing all potential genes or genera together. As a result, limited number of genes explained about 40% of the variability in both feed efficiency indicators. Combining information from rumen metagenome-assembled genomes and partial least square analysis results, microbial genera carrying these genes were determined and indicated that a limited number of important genera impacting on feed efficiency. In addition, potential mechanisms explaining significant difference between Low and High feed efficiency animals were analyzed considering, based on the literature, their gastrointestinal location of action. High feed efficiency animals were associated with microbial species including severalEubacteriumhaving the genetic capacity to form biofilm or releasing metabolites like butyrate or propionate known to provide a greater contribution to cattle energy requirements compared to acetate. Populations associated with fucose sensing or hemolysin production, both mechanisms specifically described in the lower gut by activating the immune system to compete with pathogenic colonizers, were also identified to affect feed efficiency using rumen microbiome information. Microbial mechanisms associated with low feed efficiency animals involved potential pathogens within Proteobacteria and Spirochaetales, releasing less energetic substrates (e.g., acetate) or producing sialic acid to avoid the host immune system. Therefore, this study focusing on genes known to be involved in host-microbiome interaction improved the identification of rumen microbial genetic capacities and potential mechanisms significantly impacting on feed efficiency in beef cattle fed high concentrate diet.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] Complete genome sequence of the termite hindgut bacterium Spirochaeta coccoides type strain (SPN1T), reclassification in the genus Sphaerochaeta as Sphaerochaeta coccoides comb. nov and emendations of the family Spirochaetaceae and the genus Sphaerochaeta
    Abt, Birte
    Han, Cliff
    Scheuner, Carmen
    Lu, Megan
    Lapidus, Alla
    Nolan, Matt
    Lucas, Susan
    Hammon, Nancy
    Deshpande, Shweta
    Cheng, Jan-Fang
    Tapia, Roxanne
    Goodwin, Lynne A.
    Pitluck, Sam
    Liolios, Konstantinos
    Pagani, Ioanna
    Ivanova, Natalia
    Mavromatis, Konstantinos
    Mikhailova, Natalia
    Huntemann, Marcel
    Pati, Amrita
    Chen, Amy
    Palaniappan, Krishna
    Land, Miriam
    Hauser, Loren
    Brambilla, Evelyne-Marie
    Rohde, Manfred
    Spring, Stefan
    Gronow, Sabine
    Goeker, Markus
    Woyke, Tanja
    Bristow, James
    Eisen, Jonathan A.
    Markowitz, Victor
    Hugenholtz, Philip
    Kyrpides, Nikos C.
    Klenk, Hans-Peter
    Detter, John C.
    [J]. STANDARDS IN GENOMIC SCIENCES, 2012, 6 (02): : 194 - 209
  • [2] Alemu AW, 2017, J ANIM SCI, V95, P3727, DOI [10.2527/jas.2017.1501, 10.2527/jas2017.1501]
  • [3] Identification, Comparison, and Validation of Robust Rumen Microbial Biomarkers for Methane Emissions Using Diverse Bos Taurus Breeds and Basal Diets
    Auffret, Marc D.
    Stewart, Robert
    Dewhurst, Richard J.
    Duthie, Carol-Anne
    Rooke, John A.
    Wallace, Robert J.
    Freeman, Tom C.
    Snelling, Timothy J.
    Watson, Mick
    Roehe, Rainer
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 8
  • [4] The rumen microbiome as a reservoir of antimicrobial resistance and pathogenicity genes is directly affected by diet in beef cattle
    Auffret, Marc D.
    Dewhurst, Richard J.
    Duthie, Carol-Anne
    Rooke, John A.
    Wallace, R. John
    Freeman, Tom C.
    Stewart, Robert
    Watson, Mick
    Roehe, Rainer
    [J]. MICROBIOME, 2017, 5
  • [5] Biofilm formation of mucosa-associated methanoarchaeal strains
    Bang, Corinna
    Ehlers, Claudia
    Orell, Alvaro
    Prasse, Daniela
    Spinner, Marlene
    Gorb, Stanislav N.
    Albers, Sonja-Verena
    Schmitz, Ruth A.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [6] Specific microbiome-dependent mechanisms underlie the energy harvest efficiency of ruminants
    Ben Shabat, Sheerli Kruger
    Sasson, Goor
    Doron-Faigenboim, Adi
    Durman, Thomer
    Yaacoby, Shamay
    Miller, Margret E. Berg
    White, Bryan A.
    Shterzer, Naama
    Mizrahi, Itzhak
    [J]. ISME JOURNAL, 2016, 10 (12) : 2958 - 2972
  • [7] Persistence of bacterial indicators and zoonotic pathogens in contaminated cattle wastes
    Blaiotta, Giuseppe
    Di Cerbo, Alessandro
    Murru, Nicoletta
    Coppola, Raffaele
    Aponte, Maria
    [J]. BMC MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 16
  • [8] Brown K, 2012, NUTRIENTS, V4, P1552, DOI [10.3390/nu4111552, 10.3390/nu4081095]
  • [9] Review: Biological determinants of between-animal variation in feed efficiency of growing beef cattle
    Cantalapiedra-Hijar, G.
    Abo-Ismail, M.
    Carstens, G. E.
    Guan, L. L.
    Hegarty, R.
    Kenny, D. A.
    Mcgee, M.
    Plastow, G.
    Relling, A.
    Ortigues-Marty, I.
    [J]. ANIMAL, 2018, 12 : S321 - S335
  • [10] Dysregulated hemolysin liberates bacteria outer membrane vesicles for cytosolic lipopolysaccharide sensing
    Chen, Shouwen
    Yang, Dahai
    Wen, Ying
    Jiang, Zhiwei
    Zhang, Lingzhi
    Jiang, Jiatiao
    Chen, Yaozhen
    Hu, Tianjian
    Wang, Qiyao
    Zhang, Yuanxing
    Liu, Qin
    [J]. PLOS PATHOGENS, 2018, 14 (08)